|
|
<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index
RE: (Fwd) Re: We lost a new Frame Relay @ Rafah
Dear
Ahmad
Let's
write them a letter today, and this letter we will ask them for their new
strategy, we sent them ours. And after that we will ask them for a meeting to
discuss both strategies. I know that there was a decision from the board asking
the ISPs about their opinion, but let's make it and them for their own new
strategy.
What
do you think?
Regards,
Ibrahim
Ibrahim & Ahmed,
We are losing the lead
on this issue. Why this tone that we are working 24 hours...as if they put us
in a spin or we don't know what we want?!! We know what we want and trying to
play nice with a 100M USD monopoly is going to pinch PITA. We need to regain
the initiative here. The ball should be back in PALTEL's court tomorrow before
the close of business.
I go back to my last suggestion that we refer to
the need for them to provide their plans, strategy, etc...IN WRITING. Also,
our letters should be sent in better English, especially when we decide to
send it to 100 peple at PALTEL.
Sam
------- Forwarded
message follows -------
Date sent:
Wed, 23 May 2001 19:14:52 +0200
To:
"Abdel Rahman Omar" <aromar@paltel.net>,
<ZahiKhouri@aol.com>,
<mkhorma@paltel.net>,
<mkhorma@aol.com>, <leith@4san.com>,
<wnajjab@mcs-palestine.com>,
<rohaifa@cabank-pal.com>,
"Haytham
Zuabi" <hzuabi@zaytona.com>,
<khalil.hamad@paltel.net>
From: Ahmed Abumarzouq <ahmed@p-i-s.com>
Subject: Re: We lost a new Frame Relay @ Rafah
Copies to:
<management@palnet.com>,
<nael.asad@paltel.net>, <muneeb@mecopal.com>,
isps@pita-palestine.org,
Board@pita-palestine.org
[
Double-click this line for list subscription options ]
Dear All,
First of all, PITA Board, ISPs and many other
individuals have
been working around the clock for the past week to come
up with a strategy. I
send our draft strategy to Dr. Abdel Rahman and he
replied back with three
points that he would like to see in the Draft.
These point were added with some
modification to the strategy, In our board
meeting this Saturday we will discuss
this draft and after the approval it
will be sent back to Dr. abdel Rahman and
after Paltel approval we will
announce a public workshop with Paltel and all
the ISPs to discuss the new
strategy in public. In my opinion we are making
progress on an issue that
has been lingering there for three years now.
My second point, having a
public forum to exchange ideas without a
draft strategy that we all agree
to is non sense we have done that tens of time
in Paltel HQ in Nabuls and
in the Grand Park hotel in Ramallah, nothing
happened, just talk, so we are
not going to do it again unless we have a general
understanding and basic
agreement on these issues and we can work the minor
details
later.
Finally, I hope by the next week we will have a mutually
agreed
upon strategy that will be beneficial to both of us. If you would
like to
address all the ISPs in Palestine just post
to
isps@pita-palestine.org and to address the board of PITA post to
pita@pita-palestine.org and we will post it for you. Take care and thanks
for listening
At 04:38 ã 23/05/01, Abdel Rahman Omar wrote:
>Nael,
>
>Explanation
please.
>
>MAAN,
>
>THE BALL IS AND HAS BEEN IN YOUR
COURT SINCE THE LAST TIME WE SPOKE AND
>DISCUSSED THESE AND OTHER
ISSUES.
>
>I ALSO BELIEVE IT IS THE SAME COURT AS FAR AS PIS, POL
ETC ETC...ARE
>CONCERNED. WE WILL NOT DEAL WITH ONE ISP AT A TIME. YOU
FOLKS DO NOT SEEM TO BE
>ORGANIZED OR HAVE A UNIFIED VOICE TO REPRESENT
YOU OR SPEAK ON YOUR BEHALF.
>
>WE REPEATEDLY REQUESTED A FORUM TO
EXCHANGE VIEWS AND ARRIVE AT MUTUALLY
>ACCEPTABLE AND BENEFICIAL WAYS
AND/OR CONDITIONS FOR WORKING TOGETHER WITH
ALL
>ISP'S.
>
>YOU FOLKS SUGGESTED PITA.
>
>WE
HAVE YET TO RECEIVE A REPLY. WE WILL CONTINUE TO WAIT. BUT PLEASE DO
NOT
>COMPLAIN IN THE
MEANTIME.
>
>Regards,
>
>Abdel Rahman
Omar
>
>____________________________________________________________________________
>_______________
>
>
>-----
Original Message -----
>From: "Maan Bseiso"
<maan@palnet.com>
>To: <aromar@paltel.net>;
<ZahiKhouri@aol.com>;
<mkhorma@paltel.net>;
><mkhorma@aol.com>
>Cc:
<management@palnet.com>; <nael.asad@paltel.net>;
<muneeb@mecopal.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 5:10
PM
>Subject: FW: We lost a new Frame Relay @
Rafah
>
>
> > Dear Mr. Khouri and Mr. Omar...
>
>
> > Please find below another case of unfair competition . This
case is in
> > Rafah, how can we trust paltel to install the frame
relay lines for us, if
> > they are telling our customers to dump us
and take internet from Paltel.
>Is
> > this the synergy we are
talking about
> >
> > I demand that you do something about
it .. this has gone too far..
> >
> >
> >
-----Original Message-----
> > From: Samer Sabri
[mailto:samers@palnet.com]
> > Sent: 22/May/2001 04:50 PM
>
> To: maan@palnet.com
> > Cc: Samer Sabri
> > Subject: We
lost a new Frame Relay @ Rafah
> > Importance: High
>
>
> >
> > Salam Maan ...
> >
> > We
sent an offer through Meco to a new Internet Cafe @ Rafah .. it was in
>
> 22/4/01 and they gave us the acceptance @ 9/5/01.
> >
>
> We sent to Paltel request for the F/R but they told us that they need
a
>week
> > to install this service in Rafah. But in 20/5/01
when Paltel tech team
>went
> > there to Install the DTU @ the
Internet Café they told him that they can
> > give him the same
service in better price which is $320. After that he
> > called
Mohamad at Palnet's office in Gaza and he told him that he want to
>
> stop the order from Palnet and he want to take the F/R service from
Paltel.
> >
> > What can we do with Paltel about that , and
its not the first time they
>are
> > doing this?
>
>
> > Thanks
> > Samer
> >
> >
>
>
Best Regards
Ahmed Abumarzouq, CPA
President &
CEO
Palestinian Internet Services
WWW.P-I-S.COM
Tel: +(970) 8
2843197
Fax: +(970) 8 2843377
Some countries are still using the Israeli
Code 972
------- End of forwarded
message -------
- Replies
-
- Letter to Paltel, Ahmed Abumarzouq
<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index
|
