RE: "MAP to react promptly"

["PITA" <abudaka@pita-palestine.org>]

BOARD, FYI

Finally, Omar is up-set a success story for the day!
Omar, Even if I signed all LOAs as you have left with Irene, my
understanding that Irene would have not given PITA the money as I told you
yesterday, this is because of the condition you attached to them, this what
have prompted my revision of all bending LOAs now and will certainly do in
the future!
I must repeat here that me not signing the LOAs was not the cause for
delaying the payments! This is CCed to Irene for confirmation.
Also Said is CCed since it will involve DAI and PITA policy and relation
revision and I can also confirm that we are still a team but could involve
each fighting for his corner in the same room! Definitely no personal hard
feelings.
The good thing about new website which you have paid for, you can't send
msgs for board@pita because I have bared you from doing so, I let you, for
the time being send/receive to members@pita but could stop this as well if
you do not keep cool and nice to me and to PITA in general! This is what I
call utilizing aid money for ones own agenda.
Regards
Mashhour Abudaka

-----Original Message-----
From: Omar_Sahili@dai.com [mailto:Omar_Sahili@dai.com]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:58 AM
To: abudaka@pita-palestine.org
Cc: ibrahim_barham@safad.com
Subject: "MAP to react promptly"


Dear Mashhour;

I have received your 2 emails on the LOAs of the website & Directory and
the Strategic Planning workshop.

In my original emails to you, I CCed Irene and Said because it involved
payments authorizations. You have the right not to sign anything you don't
like, but It's funny that you CC the board, Said & Irene on such
operational matters, maybe you should start CCing members@pita for all of
our emails.

It's funny that in your meeting with Said & I, there was a cash crisis in
PITA that we -at MAP- need to be dynamic in our rules to secure payments,
and then you return the LOAs not signed for non-relevant wordings.

It's funny that you require that you should get the LOA drafts before hand,
although they were sent to you earlier with no response (please check your
email )

It's funny that you require changes in the LOAs that (those changes) would
simply prevent me from getting approval on payments. Now, if you don't
understand why they're there, then you ought to ask on their relevance
before stopping the LOA and ask to remove them. (e.g. the CLIN)

It's funny that you demand to negotiate LOAs before the activities are
done, since this is our demand that PITA claims to be "unnecessary paper
work"

It's funny that we have to waste our times on done-activities instead of
working on LOAs to come.

Mashhour, I'm starting to get sick of the song that MAP is "not acting
promptly" and that MAP require so many "un-necessary things that PITA
doesn't have the resources to do". We either do this as a team or we simply
don't.

Omar