2 Major Issues Emerging from Responses and Consultation

2.1 The large number of respondents, particularly those within the University, calling for the expansion of research activity indicated that they support the MOHE view that research belongs within or at least under the auspices of a university. The valuable ideas which were put forward in relation to research provide a basis for developing the University's overall policy in this area.

2.2 Research has been inhibited at Bethlehem University by various factors, extrinsic and intrinsic.

2.3 Much research has been in response to community needs. A major impetus to research at Bethlehem University was the Community Studies and Socio-Economic Survey carried out 1988-90 (Dowling, 1990). This project, carried out in very difficult times, proved the competency of research efforts and led to the introduction of new and valuable initiatives to meet community needs (e.g., the training programs in Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Midwifery, Neonatal Nursing and Clinical Supervision).

2.4 Responses from within the University emphasized that the quality of teaching in a university is enhanced by active involvement in research and the advancement of knowledge.

3 Proposed Initiatives

• Development of a University Institute for Community Partnership and Research1.
• Following a commitment to the expansion of research activities, with focus on potential for immediate development, a compilation of a directory of research interests and expertise available.
• Exploitation of the potential of local and international linkages and access to international networks. With full utilization of international linkages via new technology envisaged, immediate attention to acquiring and developing the necessary infrastructure.
• The development of links between research and teaching programs (undergraduate and postgraduate) to improve the quality of teaching and to make the curriculum more relevant to the community's needs.
• Appreciation of research work when calculating teaching loads.
• Encouragement of creative ideas to maximize potential resources without major expansion of facilities or staff.

1There would be major benefits in having a single Institute:

• Appointment of one overall administrator to advise, to explore new areas for development and opportunities for funding and to liaise with Ministries, funders and other Institutes
• Concentration of research activities will raise the profile of the overall importance of research endeavors at Bethlehem University and reaffirm the University's commitment to research and development
• Greater visibility and easier access for the community to University research activities
• The range of expertise and facilities available will be publicized and requests to utilize the services will be welcomed in keeping with the University's mission
• The prestige of belonging to a University supported and publicized unit
• Minimization of duplication, coordination and efficient shared use of support services and facilities required
• Common problems emerging in areas of funding, proposal and report writing, equipment importation and maintenance, etc., can be identified and solutions shared
• New ideas for development of further research areas and activities can be fostered in the Institute. All academic staff will be actively encouraged to participate in research and outreach activities. Academic staff wishing to become involved in research will have access to the expertise of the Institute and the experience of those already working there.