|
|
<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index
Re: Paltel and ISPs
Sam,
I agree
with you that we are addressing the wrong entity and Paltel entry into
the market is legitimate, but let's look at it this way:
- MOPT is refusing to even talk with us ( ISPs and PITA) and in the
same time has already granted Paltel the license to enter into the
market.
- Paltel is creating a de facto status on the ground, up to 60
corporate accounts in less than three months, at this rate we will close
shops very soon.
- We are unable to change things on the ground
With this in mind my thinking was, why don't we strike a deal that
will eventually benefit ISPs, consumers and of course Paltel. Now let us
look at Paltel conditions:
- not to sell VOIP, we have already done so by signing on the Leased
Line contract and the Internet connection contract.
- To increase the penetration rate in Palestine, we all love to do so
and this is only doable with Paltel cooperation by reducing
infrastructure cost - do not count on MOPT to enforce Paltel.
- To use Paltel infrastructure exclusively, for me I don't see a
problem once Paltel support level and redundancy get at least close to
its Israeli counterparts, so this could be done gradually
At 07:12 ã 20/05/01, Sam Bahour wrote:
Ahmed,
I am still reading this material, but let's get our terminology
right. Deal
striking with PALTEL to create regulation not only does not work but is
addressing the wrong entity. Also, I did not know that we
"all" took for
granted that PALTEL's entry into the ISP market is legitimate.
Salaam,
Sam
On 20 May 2001,, Ahmed Abumarzouq wrote:
> Dear All,
> As you
all know Paltel entry into the ISPs market is a reality
> now, it is our only chance now to strike a deal with Paltel that
will
> regulate this industry and help all of us grow and prosper. With the
help
> of PITA all of us need to come up with a unified position that will
help us plan
> for the future, I was delegated by PITA board to come up with a
concept paper
> that can be used as a middle point between ISPs represented by PITA
and Paltel.
> Let's work on this issue together and come up with this documents in
two days.
> If you know any ISP wether it is a PITA member or not please let me
know so we
> can include it in the discussion. As you probably know PITA
has submitted a
> formal document to Paltel, here it is "Draft Strategy for
Paltel's Involvement
> in the Palestinian Internet Market
>
> Presented by PITA
> (as requested by PALTEL Advisor to the Board of Directors Abdel
Rahman Omar on
> 3/5/01)
>
> Based upon the following assumptions:
> 1. PALTEL and PITA are both interested
in significantly increasing the
> number of Internet subscribers throughout Palestine.
2. PALTEL and PITA are
> both seeking the advancement of the information technology sector
via
> introduction of new and modern services.
3. PALTEL is fully aware of
> existing and licensed Palestinian Internet Service Providers and has
no
> intention of introducing services that would negatively affect these
Providers
> existence and/or livelihood. 4. PITA,
representing private sector
> information technology companies is, as part of its charter, bound
to act with
> the appropriate entities and authorities to prevent unfair
competition in the
> sector and is dedicated to pursue the legitimate rights of its
members. 5.
> As prevalent in telecom sectors worldwide, PITA feels an obligation
to raise the
> awareness and secure a clear separation between the monopoly
provider and other
> service providers, whom are dependent on its services. Therefore,
PITA
> recommends that PALTEL adopt the following strategy:
1. Given PALTELs'
> current monopoly advantage as the supplier of backbone communication
services,
> and understanding that any attempt to be a supplier of Internet
Service to
> subscribers while at the same time providing backbone service to the
existing
> ISPs, will create unfair competition within the market. Therefore,
PALTEL should
> refrain from becoming an end-user supplier for Internet Services.
2. This
> policy should be unambiguously made public in order for existing and
future
> Internet Service Providers to be able to invest in their businesses
with a clear
> sense of investment security. 3.
PALTEL should focus and facilitate on
> providing the required backbone infrastructure to the Internet
Service Providers
> in order for them to build and grow their businesses.
4. PALTEL should
> reduce, as much as possible, the cost of communication services to
ISP's, and
> ISP subscribers, in order to guarantee the largest and fastest
market
> penetration possible. 5. PALTEL should
do its at most to improve its
> technical staff and services to be able to provide the same
technical support
> that ISPs are getting from other providers. "
>
> And Paltel reply to this document was as follows
>
> "As discussed, Paltel's objectives/requirements are, briefly,
as follows:
>
> 1- Internet Penetration in Palestine to reach 10% in the very near
future
> (i.e. in excess of 30K subscribers).
> 2- Paltel Infrastructure to be used exclusively. Including using
Paltel as the
> Int'l Gateways for ANY ISP services. 3-ISP's do not compete in
PalTels Licensed
> services which includes but not limited to Reselling our services in
any way
> shape or form, particularly IP Telephony in General."
>
> Now this is the first written reply from Paltel which is in my
personal
> opinion is a good move in the right direction let not lose the
momentum and move
> forward ASAP. I need your input please, put as many points as you
like. Thanks
>
>
> Best Regards
> Ahmed Abumarzouq, CPA
> President & CEO
> Palestinian Internet Services
>
WWW.P-I-S.COM
> Tel: +(970) 8 2843197
> Fax: +(970) 8 2843377
> Some countries are still using the Israeli Code 972
>
Best Regards
Ahmed Abumarzouq, CPA
President & CEO
Palestinian Internet Services
WWW.P-I-S.COM
Tel: +(970) 8 2843197
Fax: +(970) 8 2843377
Some countries are still using the Israeli Code 972
<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index
|