<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index
Re: Paltel and ISPs
Sam,
        I agree with you that we are addressing the wrong entity and Paltel entry into the market is legitimate, but let's look at it this way:
  • MOPT is refusing to even talk with us ( ISPs and PITA) and in the same time has already granted Paltel the license to enter into the market.
  • Paltel is creating a de facto status on the ground, up to 60 corporate accounts in less than three months, at this rate we will close shops very soon.
  • We are unable to change things on the ground
With this in mind my thinking was, why don't we strike a deal that will eventually benefit ISPs, consumers and of course Paltel. Now let us look at Paltel conditions:
  • not to sell VOIP, we have already done so by signing on the Leased Line contract and the Internet connection contract.
  • To increase the penetration rate in Palestine, we all love to do so and this is only doable with Paltel cooperation by reducing infrastructure cost - do not count on MOPT to enforce Paltel.
  • To use Paltel infrastructure exclusively, for me I don't see a problem once Paltel support level and redundancy get at least close to its Israeli counterparts, so this could be done gradually 


At 07:12 ã 20/05/01, Sam Bahour wrote:
Ahmed,

I am still reading this material, but let's get our terminology right.  Deal
striking with PALTEL to create regulation not only does not work but is
addressing the wrong entity.  Also, I did not know that we "all" took for
granted that PALTEL's entry into the ISP market is legitimate.

Salaam,
Sam

On 20 May 2001,, Ahmed Abumarzouq wrote:

> Dear All,
>           As you all know Paltel entry into the ISPs market is a reality
> now, it is our only chance now to strike a deal with Paltel that will
> regulate this industry and help all of us grow and prosper. With the help
> of PITA all of us need to come up with a unified position that will help us plan
> for the future, I was delegated by PITA board to come up with a concept paper
> that can be used as a middle point between ISPs represented by PITA and Paltel.
> Let's work on this issue together and come up with this documents in two days.
> If you know any ISP wether it is a PITA member or not please let me know so we
> can include it in the discussion. As you probably know  PITA has submitted a
> formal document to Paltel, here it is "Draft Strategy for Paltel's Involvement
> in the Palestinian Internet Market
>
> Presented by PITA
> (as requested by PALTEL Advisor to the Board of Directors Abdel Rahman Omar on
> 3/5/01)
>
> Based upon the following assumptions:
> 1.      PALTEL and PITA are both interested in significantly increasing the
> number of Internet subscribers throughout Palestine. 2.      PALTEL and PITA are
> both seeking the advancement of the information technology sector via
> introduction of new and modern services. 3.      PALTEL is fully aware of
> existing and licensed Palestinian Internet Service Providers and has no
> intention of introducing services that would negatively affect these Providers
> existence and/or livelihood. 4.      PITA, representing private sector
> information technology companies is, as part of its charter, bound to act with
> the appropriate entities and authorities to prevent unfair competition in the
> sector and is dedicated to pursue the legitimate rights of its members. 5.    
> As prevalent in telecom sectors worldwide, PITA feels an obligation to raise the
> awareness and secure a clear separation between the monopoly provider and other
> service providers, whom are dependent on its services. Therefore, PITA
> recommends that PALTEL adopt the following strategy: 1.      Given PALTELs'
> current monopoly advantage as the supplier of backbone communication services,
> and understanding that any attempt to be a supplier of Internet Service to
> subscribers while at the same time providing backbone service to the existing
> ISPs, will create unfair competition within the market. Therefore, PALTEL should
> refrain from becoming an end-user supplier for Internet Services. 2.      This
> policy should be unambiguously made public in order for existing and future
> Internet Service Providers to be able to invest in their businesses with a clear
> sense of investment security. 3.      PALTEL should focus and facilitate on
> providing the required backbone infrastructure to the Internet Service Providers
> in order for them to build and grow their businesses. 4.      PALTEL should
> reduce, as much as possible, the cost of communication services to ISP's, and
> ISP subscribers, in order to guarantee the largest and fastest market
> penetration possible. 5.      PALTEL should do its at most to improve its
> technical staff and services to be able to provide the same technical support
> that ISPs are getting from other providers. "
>
> And Paltel reply to this document was as follows
>
> "As discussed, Paltel's objectives/requirements are, briefly, as follows:
>
> 1- Internet Penetration in Palestine to reach 10% in the very near future
> (i.e. in excess of 30K subscribers).
> 2- Paltel Infrastructure to be used exclusively. Including using Paltel as the
> Int'l Gateways for ANY ISP services. 3-ISP's do not compete in PalTels Licensed
> services which includes but not limited to Reselling our services in any way
> shape or form, particularly IP Telephony in General."
>
> Now this is the first written reply from Paltel which is in my personal
> opinion is a good move in the right direction let not lose the momentum and move
> forward ASAP. I need your input please, put as many points as you like. Thanks
>
>
> Best Regards
> Ahmed Abumarzouq, CPA
> President & CEO
> Palestinian Internet Services
> WWW.P-I-S.COM
> Tel: +(970) 8 2843197
> Fax: +(970) 8 2843377
> Some countries are still using the Israeli Code 972
>

Best Regards
Ahmed Abumarzouq, CPA
President & CEO
Palestinian Internet Services
WWW.P-I-S.COM
Tel: +(970) 8 2843197
Fax: +(970) 8 2843377
Some countries are still using the Israeli Code 972


<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index