Just as the Jewish settling procedures discharged the settlements which were distributed between both kinds of Kibbutz and Moshav, these same procedures created yet another sort of settlements, bearing military aspect this time, in the shape of Nahal. Nahal constituted a particular kind of settlements, precisely aiming at hosting soldiers within their campuses, whose sites were located in the strategic spots, making of them belligerent fortresses under civil embodiment; hence, Nahal have been supplying the direct assistance to the terrorist activities targeting the Arab people in Palestine, either during the mandate rule or throughout the first Israeli-Arab war.
And just as the Zionist preparation process discharged the Jewish youth organizations which were created in order to achieve the ultimate settling goal and paving the way for the Jewish emigrants to establish their full presence in Palestine, this process also discharged the Gadnah organization which resembled to the bridge upon which every Zionist was able to cross from his civil status to the military one, inside the preparation process, to fight in order to create the desired "state".
However, the military structure of the Zionist movement during the mandate reign was embodied in the pure terrorist organizations; and if Haganah which held a quasi-official status, and which performed openly and represented a legitimate apparatus within the British-Zionist cooperation mechanism striving to fulfill the Balfour Promise (alongside Balmach which constituted its military arm), remained working under the total and direct control of the Jewish Agency and derived its instructions from the World Zionist Organization which acted under the auspices of Mapai party (later the Labor party), it should be mentioned that many other terrorist organizations have been extremely secretly active, killing the Arab people (and the British presence symbols in Palestine, 1943-1948) with unprecedented ruthless.
In this regard, an infernal plan initiated by the Zionist leadership (within the World Zionist Organization and the Jewish Agency) allowed these unofficial organizations to act freely and decisively, consisting of pushing these terrorist groups to direct their operations against the Arabs (but also the English, and the Jewish individuals in particular cases featured in the upcoming stages of this study) during the 10-year period that preceded the establishment of the "state", while the recognized official political leaderships (both the World Zionist Organization and the Jewish Agency) renounced their activities, declaring themselves irresponsibles regarding the operations launched and directly led by Haganah. Thus, the operations were divided between the terrorist organizations: the " official" one (Haganah) operating quite legitimately, while the "unofficial" ones (mainly Irgun and Stern) acting in accordance to their own interests, just like the tumultuous son who never respects his parents.
We won't get deep in the definition and explanation of the terrorist files related to these groups, as many other authors and historians previously achieved this delicate and essential task; however, we would like to insist on the terrorist legacy of the Zionist ideology, deeply rooted within the pure profile of both the "official" and "unofficial" Zionist terrorist organizations.
We have already tackled the story of Vladimir
Jabotinsky, one of the predominant figures of the Zionist leaders following
the death of Theodor Herzl, he also was one of the main opponents of Haim
Weizmann who led the World Zionist Organization
between 1905 and 1948, The substantial
difference between both Herzl's disciples (Herzl being their grand master),
despite being both loyal to him, each on his own, was that Weizmann (and
his political school and supporters) resorted to hide his hostile, expansionist
and terrorist intentions under the cover of political activity and diplomatic
endeavors, succeeding in this way to secure the "License" of the Balfour
Promise over one part of Palestine, and directing the British mandate over
Palestine to work on the basis of adhering to the commitment of creating
the Jewish state before the highest international organization (the League
of Nations).
In this context, Weizmann managed to import
many waves of new Jewish settlers, opening for them the way to establish
their settlements, to acquire additional lands, funds and new jobs, in
order to build the Jewish society structures in Palestine during
the mandate period, that is a "state"
within another state, a newly- created one with its own laws, systems,
language, symbols, management, schools, as well as health, education, and
social apparatus, alongside the workers and women unions, clubs, broadcasting
and media profiles.
As for Vladimir Jabotinsky, he never opted to hide his own intentions, nor his unlimited ambitions; he wasn't even convinced about the provisional process and gradual advance in attaining the goals already set, which bring up to recognize that both men defined a direct target, but entertained contradictory views withregard the priority of its echelon, and the extremism upon which this goal should be achieved. Weizmann overlaid the power a political gown, while his direct challenger encrusted the politic a power gown; and while Weizmann's hand held the negotiation and communication utilities, hiding at the same time the war devices, Jabotinsky resorted to openly clinch the weapon in his hand, even when conducting political endeavors and direct negotiations. Weizmann concentrated his efforts on Palestine within the mandate official borderlines as a fixed base to launch his project, while this base was opened according to Jabotinsky to the East end to include the Eastern lands of the Jordan river (or Trans-Jordan). Both men have been cooking the same recipe, but with 2 different tastes.
As the Zionist movement succeeded in gaining the upper hand over the World Zionist Organization during the mandate period, the deep contradiction between both approaches of Weizmann and Jabotinsky began to take ample dimension, leading to a victorious side and a losing other one. Admittedly, Jabotinsky breakaway from the, and World Zionist Organization later on, and created the "New Zionist Movement" even his most ardent supporters dubbed it as the "Revisionist Zionism" What really means to us in this conflict (a peaceful one, generally) which lasted for 20 years, is that Jabotinsky's movement proved to be the phenomenal background from which the "Unofficial' Zionist terrorism was initially launched against the Arab people in Palestine, until 1948.
In this regard, Jabotinsky revealed his extreme admiration to the heroics of the " Grandfathers" in the Old Testament of Torah, particularly the massacres committed by them against the original people of Palestine (following the ancient Hebrews' betrayal to the Egyptians and the later confrontation which opposed them against this people before their final exit from Egypt), the capture of the Palestinian people's properties, cattle and women by force, and dealing with Palestine's neighbors with clear arrogance. Jabotinsky called for reviving these "heroics" and practicing these methods in order to conquer Palestine once again; he also insisted on studying the arts of war and combat deeply rooted in the ancient Jewish culture very carefully At the same time, Jabotinsky was a firm admirer of both Hitler's and Mussolini's leaderships, thus his followers strived to create for him the mechanism which allowed the firm expression of this belligerence, in total contrast to the political-negotiation initiatives led by the Mapai party to reach its own goal.
3 or 4 Zionist terrorist organizations established themselves under the reign of the " Jabotinskism" line, and discretely coordinated their operations with Haganah, while openly claimed full responsibility of relying on terrorism as the sole access to gain the ultimate power; the "New Zionist Movement" (which dissolved itself during the 40's, only to pave the way for its members to rejoin the mother organization, that's the World Zionist Organization) gave birth to a main political faction, the "Herut" party, which, under Menachem Begin' s guide, initiated the rise of Likud. Hence, the Jabotinskism leadership was transferred from its creator to Menachem Begin, and then to Yitzhak Shamir, and now to Benjamin Netanyahu: a comprehensive terrorist line adhering to politics, against a political line adhering to terrorism. From David Ben-Gurion, to Levi Eshkol, to Golda Meir, to Yitzhak Rabin, to Shimon Perez, to Ehud Barak... 2 paralleled lines, and 2 faces of a same coin.
The terrorism line focused its aggressive and brutal operations on 4 various groups: the Palestinian Arab people at the first degree, as revealed at the outcome of the massacres of 1947 and 1948, committed in constant and brutal fashion, where in each of them the Arab population of a given region was expelled out from its own territory, resulting in the most dangerous period of deracinating the Arab people presence and emptying Palestine from its own population.
The second targeted group by the Zionist acts has been the British presence during the 40's, in a cruel attempt to force Britain to rush toward the creation of the "state", primarily by means of opening the road for the Jewish emigration waves to Palestine and arming its members.
The third group which fell under the Zionist terrorist attacks was some of the foreign sides who didn't comply enough to the Zionist greedy aspiration; it was in this context that Comte Bernadott and his personal escort were killed in 1948; as for the fourth and most outrageous targeted, it was the Jewish people itself for whom the Zionist terrorists claimed they are fighting and also get killed for its sake, its own interest and protection; this was clearly revealed in the torpedoing of ships carrying Jewish emigrants from Europe, and sinking them just before the Palestinian and Turkish coastal lines, as well as destroying the homes, commercial stores and religious sites of Iraqi Jews in Baghdad; the sinking of the ship with human beings onboard was directly initiated in order to incite the whole world against the British rejection of the Zionist projects; as for the Jewish bloodshed overwhelming the Iraqi capital, Baghdad, it was meant to push the local Jews of the entire Arab world to leave their homes and head directly to Palestine; thus, thousands of innocent and peaceful Jews, including women, children and old people, have been the victims of these Zionist terrorist acts.
This situation changed, formally, after the establishment of the "state" in 1948, and the inclusion of all the terrorist organizations to the newly formed army, for which Haganah represented its nucleus; just as the "state" inherited the responsibility of the Jews in the world, claiming its sole representative role and awareness over their interests, it has also inherited the terrorist-military-subversive aspect from the Zionist movement, and declared itself the sole responsible side of the full implementation regarding this aspect. Therefore, the complete Zionist terrorism has been officially directed and administrated from the highest echelons of this "state" either openly or, secretly. Thus, there has not been, during the past 50 years, an official or unofficial terrorism, a legitimate or unlegitimate one, we have only one kind of terrorism, guided by one leadership and one single decision: this is the state's terrorism; the terrorism was amalgamated within the "state", as previously incorporated within the status of the Zionist movement.
The Zionist terrorist state, built on terrorism of for its purposes, is the only side practicing pure terrorism during nearly 50 years, and it will remain exercising it as long as this state should be alive; the extraction of terrorism characteristic from "Israel" is like its removal from the Zionist movement, and it is quite impossible to achieve this option.
From this point, Israel's history was a series of consecutive wars, and there is no country out of the 180 modern nations affiliated with the international community, other than " Israel" , possessing a similar history of constant wars and military conflicts. Yes indeed, there are military regimes, also warring nations, but there is no state like the Zionist one, for which militarism was its continuous characteristic during the times of peace and wars, and for which its comprehensive political, social, cultural, economic and international life, and its relation with itself and the other nations, had been established on the continuous war principle. As we have reiterated many times during the earlier parts of this study, militarism is one of the main predominant aspects of Zionism, and not just a mere expedient to achieve other defined goals.
There have been wars against the Arabs,
which were initiated to create the planned
"state", then to protect and expand it,
from 1948-1949, through 1956, 1967, 1973, 1978 and 1982. The Zionist practices
also included the capture of neighboring territories in Egypt, the Sinai
peninsula, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon, following the internal Zionist expansion
that included all of Palestine's territory, alongside the occupation of
large regional lands in conjunction with a huge military presence, and
an unprecedented series of aggressive assaults and massacres committed
against the Palestinians and other Arab peoples, exceeding the borderlines
of Palestine, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Egypt, to reach Iraq and Tunisia.
Assassination operations have also been committed by the Zionist "state", targeting individuals as well as blowing up various institutions, which affected the pure presence of dozens of Arab and non-Arab cities, even reaching the intellectuals and scholars, as well as the political activists, never excluding the children and women, nor the schools, religious sites, universities, industries, commercial stores, transport roads, airplanes, villages and neighborhoods. It was indeed David Ben-Gurion who said during the announcement of the Israeli state creation the following phrase: "Judaism fell by blood and fire, and its revival will be established once again by blood and fire".
Zionist militarism possesses its very own assets and utilities, in order to guarantee its effectiveness and brutality; advanced weaponry, military industries, infernal use of scientific and technological outputs, extreme cooperation with the advanced nations in the field of military industry, a widespread presence of intelligence workgroups inside and outside "Israel" which prime function includes monitoring, following, files drafting and killing when the orders are firmly instructed.
Intelligence field also gathers the agents, Jewish and Israelis as well as non-Jewish and non-Israelis, featuring also Moslem and Christian Arab nationals, as well as Christian and Moslem non-Arab nationals, supported by many intelligence agencies and apparatuses that excel in the art of developed and sophisticated reconnaissance, and backed by one of the most biggest budgets in the world, which came in top priority, even before other interests such as providing education, health and food services and supplies. " Allied" countries like the United States and some West European nations regularly allocate grants and credits which are used by the Zionist entity to serve the needs of the military spirit and intelligence operations.
Thanks to its military spirit, "Israel" turned out to be an "army". the Israeli army is its people, country and governing status. There is no country in the world having military servicemen so deeply infiltrated within its civil life, at all levels, resulting in the transformation of the complete nation into a real barracks, including its business, economy, cultural institutions, industries, laboratories and representatives inside and outside the country, like what is happening in "Israel".
In addition, Israel's majority political elite figures during the past SO years have came from the army, and still constitutes the most active and predominant section within the local society. We have only to cite the names of Moshe Dayan, Haim Bar-Lev, Yitzhak Rabin, Yitzhak Shamir, David Levi, Ariel Sharon, Haim Herzog, Ehud Barak and Ezer Weizmann: heads of state, Prime Ministers, ministers, Knesset members, party leaders, ambassadors and top executives, as well as highly-ranked officials in the civil institutions, industries, cultural academies and various interests. It isn't even surprising to see that the duplicity pairing between military and civil sub- worlds within the Zionist framework, succeeded to eliminate and possible hurdle between the military service and the civil one in the Israeli society.
This situation is affecting the "Peace' world at the same extent regarding the war world; the difference between both mentioned worlds is an illusive one, resembling to the length and width lines of the world's geographic map. In this context, the "Peace" negotiation process is also a military work, deeply connected to the Zionist military approach; it holds a military profile with all its goals, means, politicians, plans, programs, periods of time, and its local and international dimensions.
We deeply hope, within our unveiling of
this Zionist modern orientation, which is a substantial part of the comprehensive
Zionist planning, to remember that the Zionists themselves rushed to rip
apart the phony slogan related to the negotiations process "Land for Peace",
and turned it into a "Land for Security" claim.. , what is between "Peace"
and "Security" is the very same thing separating between paradise and hell.