Daily Report

June Wednesday 21-2000:


Introduction:
In a landmark meeting, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan paid a visit to Hizbullah Secretary General H.E Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah who warned that the Islamic Resistance (IR) fighters will resume their struggle if Israel continues to violate Lebanon's border. Nasrallah, also, stressed the Lebanese hostages inside Israel's jails should be released promptly, otherwise, the Israeli retreat will be incomplete. For its part, Annan said that the world body takes any border violations in southern Lebanon very seriously and will work to correct Israeli incursions into the UN-demarcated withdrawal line.
However, Amnesty International and Lebanon’s Follow-up committee for the support of the Lebanese Detainees in the Israeli Prisons demanded a worldwide denunciation of an Israeli draft bill that allows the Jewish state to detain wartime prisoners as bargaining chips in contravention of international norms. 


Hizbullah warns UN to play fair (1)
Nasrallah UN should resolve quickly & swiftly all Israeli violations
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan left Beirut on Tuesday following a landmark meeting with  Hizbullah’s secretary-general, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, at a heavily guarded building deep in the party’s stronghold in the southern suburbs of Beirut.
The unprecedented visit by Annan was an attempt to win support from Hizbullah for his plans to expand peacekeeping efforts throughout the South, tacitly acknowledging the party’s crucial influence in the area.
The first-ever meeting between a UN secretary-general and a Hizbullah leader reflected ­ in the eyes of the international community ­ the organization’s transformation from the “terrorist” pariah of the 1980s to a valid and recognized political and social-welfare institution.
Speaking to reporters after the 20-minute meeting, Annan said that he had held “good discussions” with Nasrallah, covering the continued Israeli violations of Lebanese sovereignty, socio-economic needs in the South, Lebanese detainees in Israeli prisons and “cooperation between UNIFIL, the government and non-state actors.”
Accompanying Annan was Timur Goksel, UNIFIL’s special adviser and spokesman.
“It was a very useful and friendly meeting, very person-to-person,” said Goksel. “Nasrallah offered his continued support to UNIFIL.”
Nonetheless, Hizbullah called on the UN to swiftly resolve the outstanding Israeli violations along the border and warned that failure to do so would lead to renewed resistance attacks.
“Resistance fighters fought bloody battles to reach liberation and they are not willing to wait any longer for political mediation to eradicate these border encroachments,” a statement quoted Nasrallah as having told Annan. “The United Nations is called upon to resolve quickly and decisively all Israeli violations because the ‘Blue Line’ does not mean anything to us,” he added, referring to the UN line behind which Israel is supposed to withdraw its forces.

ANNAN VOWS TO "CORRECT" ISRAELI BORDER VIOLATIONS
UN Secretary General Kofi Annan vowed to pursue the issue of border violations and Lebanese held in Israeli detention centers with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak. Annan had drawn Lebanese criticism for confirming Israel's pullout from Lebanon before UN experts and Lebanese military officers finish their verification of Israel's pullout from the south. Lebanon has voiced anger over Israel's continued occupation of Lebanese land, and warned it will prevent UN peacekeepers from deploying in the border zone and will consider Israel's pullout incomplete if Israel does not withdraw its remaining forces from the south. 

(Future Television asking Annan: "What do you plan to do if Lebanon continues to reject the Israeli pullout as it is now and prevents the deployment of UN peacekeepers in southern Lebanon?" Annan responding: " I don't think that will happen. I think.. let's be careful here not to read too much into what is said and not said. I think what is important is we have violations that we are dealing with. I have worked in peace-keeping areas for many years, we have often created demilitarized zone areas.. there should not be violations, and violations can be deliberate, sometimes somebody can stray across the border so we will continue to have little incidents here and there even if we've cleared the south. We have to be sure of that, but what we are going to do is be vigilant to make sure there are no violations and UNIFIL, the government, and non-government actors should all cooperate to keep the situation calm".)

Annan is carrying a list of violations compiled by the Lebanese Army and UN experts with him to Israel. He will be asking Prime Minister Ehud Barak to ensure his troops withdraw to a UN demarcated line, which Lebanon opposes as well. The Security Council confirmed that Israel withdrew in line with Resolution 425, which calls for a troops pullout to the international border. But the Blue Line set up by the UN falls short of the frontier in some locations. Annan said UN forces are investigating Israeli incursions into Lebanon. UN officers so far confirmed that Israel had been found in violation at two points, but said the issue will be resolved in about a day. The Secretary-General asked Beirut to report any border violations to the UN force which will inturn investigate alleged incursions. Lebanese officials said Annan will report any violations to the Security Council if Israel refuses to withdraw to the Blue Line.  Annan held what was described as frosty meetings with top Lebanese officials, who were enraged by what many in Beirut believe is UN bias towards Israel. Annan who was met at Beirut airport by a cabinet minister yesterday was seen off by Prime Minister Selim Hoss. Kofi Annan failed to allay Lebanese fears over the UN's confirmation of Israel's pullout from Lebanon despite its continued occupation of at least six patches of Lebanese territory. The row threatens to destabilize the region and delay the deployment of UN peacekeepers in southern Lebanon.(2)

A senior political source said that Beirut was unwilling to become embroiled in a dispute with the UN but would continue demanding an Israeli withdrawal behind the international border and not just the UN line of withdrawal.
The source said that Israel’s violations of the so-called “Blue Line” should be addressed first. Then Lebanon will ask the UN
to charge a cartographic expert with “rectifying the mistakes” between the “Blue Line” and the international border.
The source said that as far as Lebanon was concerned, UN special envoy Terje Roed-Larsen was solely to blame for the fracas over the verification process.
Officially, Larsen, who was due to accompany Annan in Beirut, remained in New York because his aircraft developed engine trouble shortly after departure and was forced to return. However, sources here have said that Annan chose to leave him behind to avoid further irritating the Lebanese, who have been incensed by perceived bias toward Israel while setting up the Blue Line.
 Meanwhile, the joint UN and Lebanese verification team was scheduled to continue its inspection of the border area on Wednesday, checking a stretch of the frontier near Kfar Shouba that has remained off-limits so far due to the presence of land mines. The team also plans to inspect an area near the Israeli settlement of Misgav Am opposite Addaisseh.
Annan, who reportedly received Iranian assurances of a hitch-free redeployment of UNIFIL in the South, also demanded security guarantees for the peacekeeping troops who will now man the UN-demarcated line.
During his visit, Annan reportedly pledged to help Lebanon muster financial aid from donor countries for the process of reversing the effects of Israel’s 22 years of occupation in the South and the Western Bekaa.
He reportedly promised to hold contacts with Beirut-based ambassadors of donor states in order to hold a preliminary meeting in the next two weeks designed to set the stage for a full-fledged donor gathering in Beirut next month.(3)

Amnesty blasts prisoner bill (4)
Amnesty International and a local activist group demanded on Tuesday worldwide denunciation of an Israeli draft bill that allows the Jewish state to detain wartime prisoners as bargaining chips in contravention of international norms.
Lebanon’s Follow-Up Committee for the Support of the Lebanese Detainees in the Israeli Prisons published Amnesty’s open objection to the Israeli bill and called on all international human watchdog groups to help launch a campaign to defeat the bill.
London-based Amnesty International said the endorsement of the bill by the Knesset would be a flagrant violation of the Geneva convention, of which Israel is a signatory.
Amnesty also warned that the passing of this law would stimulate other states to follow suit and legalize the open-ended detention of wartime prisoners without trial or charges, which in fact is a wartime crime.
Amnesty maintained that all signatories to the Geneva pact are duty-bound to fight the Israeli bill, which is mainly directed at keeping two senior leaders as hostages pending the release of missing Israeli airman Ron Arad and other Israelis missing in action.

SHEBAA FARMS RESIDENTS DEMONSTRATE AT AIRPORT(5)
Residents of the Shebaa Farms which remain under occupation held a protest at Beirut airport minutes before Secretary-General Annan boarded his Amman-bound flight. They handed Annan a memorandum calling for the withdrawal of Israeli troops from the Shebaa plateau. The Shebaa Farms were not included in the UN withdrawal line. Annan said the Shebaa hamlets are in a zone occupied by Israel since 1967 and are subject to Resolutions 242 and 338, which called  for Israel's retreat from occupied territories, and not Resolution 425, which called on Israel to leave the zone it occupied in Lebanon in 1978. Israel said it captured the territory from Syria. 

BBC, AI reject Israeli excuse (6)
Israel, it seems, will not be let off so easily for killing BBC driver Abed Taqqoush and three other civilians in south Lebanon during its withdrawal.
Both the BBC and human-rights watchdog Amnesty International have expressed disdain for the Israeli account of the incident and have strongly hinted that they might take legal action.
“The matter is certainly not over for us,” Adrian Wells ­ who heads the BBC investigation ­ told The Daily Star on Tuesday. “We’re meeting Amnesty International lawyers hopefully this week to look at the ways forward, either through international or Israeli courts.”
Amnesty International (AI) reported that the Israeli response was “very inadequate.”
Israel said that the soldier who fired the shell that killed Taqqoush “followed procedures. Well, these procedures could be a breach of international law,” said Claudio Cordone of AI.
In a statement released last week, Israel claimed that firing the shell was a “tragic mistake” and that “under the operational circumstances in which the tank crew operated, and in the light of the data that was known at the time, the crew operated in accordance with the relevant procedures for such situations.”
On May 23, less than 24 hours before the end of Israel’s occupation, Taqqoush, 54, a long-time driver for foreign journalists, was killed when a tank shell struck his car. The shell was fired by an Israeli Merkava tank located near the settlement of Menara on the other side of the border.
Jeremy Bowen, the BBC’s Middle East correspondent, and BBC cameraman Malek Kenaan, were filming about 100 meters from the car when it was hit. Both Bowen and Kenaan were pinned down for an hour by an Israeli machine-gunner while Taqqoush’s body remained in the blazing car.
The BBC and Amnesty International immediately launched an investigation into the incident. At first, Israel blamed the shelling on the South Lebanon Army militia. But eyewitnesses in Israel and video footage from both sides have established that an Israeli tank was to blame. It wasn’t until June 16 that Israel admitted this.
In an attempt to justify the attack, Israel’s official said army personnel had spotted a “suspicious vehicle carrying individuals in civilian clothing, and suspected that they were members of a Lebanese group preparing to fire an anti-tank missile against the Israeli Army tanks and vehicles.”
What the Israeli Army failed to explain, however, was how reporters could clearly recognize the victims as civilians while the soldiers, positioned nearby, identified them as potential “terrorists.”
And the questions continue: If the Israeli Army indeed thought that the civilians were “terrorists” and that the camera equipment was a weapon ­ then why fire at the car rather than the suspects about to launch an attack, the BBC asked.
Furthermore, the BBC asked, why would the Israeli Army allow Israeli civilians to watch the unfolding events at the border if there was a risk of fighting in the area?
Taqqoush was not the only victim of the final stages of Israel’s occupation. Three other civilians were killed during the retreat. Groups of civilians and reporters also came under tank fire near where Taqqoush died, suggesting that targeting civilians was a policy rather than an isolated “mistake.”
“We believe, based on the available evidence, that the killing of Abed Taqqoush was either reckless or deliberate,” stated Ann Cooper, the executive director of the US-based Committee to Protect Journalists, in a letter addressed to Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak on Monday.
The Israeli Army findings contradict or fail to explain eyewitness accounts of events that took place on the ground,” she continued. “Moreover, the Israeli Army cannot reasonably be expected to conduct an impartial investigation into alleged misconduct by its own forces. We therefore urge you to order an immediate and thorough independent investigation into this attack and to ensure that its findings are made public.”
If it can be proven that Israel intentionally fired at Lebanese civilians, then according to international law, any state can take the case to court. The soldier who fired the missile would then be held responsible for the killing, while the Israeli government would have to compensate the victim’s family.


Footnotes:
1 – The Daily Star, 21-6-‏2000
2 – Future TV, 20-6-2000
3 – The Daily Star, 21-6-2000
4 – Same source.
5 – Future TV, 20-6-2000
6 – The Daily Star, 21-6-2000