Daily Report

June Saturday 17-2000:


Introduction

"We will always be with the resistance, as we have always been; nothing will change whatsoever" Lieutenant General Bashar Al-Assad said as he received Hizbullah Secretary General H.E. Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah ahead of a large delegation from the party including the leadership, the MPs, some religious scholars and a group of Islamic Resistance (IR) fighters.

However, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan took the Lebanese government by surprise on Friday, ignoring Beirut's objections and declaring that "Israel" had fully withdrawn from land it occupied for 22 years and therefore complied with Resolution 425.

President Emile Lahoud said "Lebanon would regard the "Israeli" withdrawal as incomplete if it is calculated against a fictitious, none-existent line". Prime Minister Salim Al-Hoss said that "Israel" has "sadly not pulled out completely from Lebanese territory".


IR, Hizbullah delegation offers condolences in Qirdaha…(1)

In faithfulness to the great Arab leader, late Syrian President Hafez al-Assad, in an act to honor him for backing the Islamic Resistance (IR) against the Zionist enemy, and in affirmation of continuing the march with his son, Lieutenant General Bashar al-Assad, Hezbollah Secretary General his Eminence Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, ahead of a large delegation from the party including the leadership, the MPs, some Ulama and a group of IR men, visited the tomb of the loss of the Arab and Islamic Ummah, the late President Hafez al-Assad, in al-Qirdaha.

The delegation recited the Fatiha for the soul of President Assad, laid wreaths of roses and laurels on his tomb in faithfulness, appreciation and respect to a man who had protected the Resistance and refused to shake hands with the Zionists.

Lieutenant General Bashar al-Assad received the Hezbollah and IR delegation with extreme honoring.

We will always be with the resistance, as we have always been; nothing will change whatsoever, Lieutenant General said as he was seeing off the delegation at the Mosque's gate.


UN chief lets "Israel" off with partial pullout

Lahoud rejects withdrawal to ‘imaginary line’…(2)

UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan took the Lebanese government by surprise on Friday, ignoring Beirut’s objections and declaring that "Israel" had fully withdrawn from land it occupied for 22 years and therefore complied with Resolution 425.

“This is a happy day for Lebanon but also for "Israel",” Annan told a news conference at UN headquarters in New York. “It’s a day for hope for the Middle East … And it’s a day of pride for the United Nations.”

Lebanon, however, was anything but happy with the announcement. Prime Minister Salim Hoss rejected the finding, insisting that “the reality on the ground as it appeared on Friday evening showed that "Israel" has not withdrawn from all Lebanese territory.”

“The Lebanese team that has been cooperating with international experts in verifying the border points has found that there are several "Israeli" military outposts still within the Lebanese border and there are several patches of Lebanese territory still under "Israeli" control in a blatant creeping annexation,” Hoss said.

“I don’t believe that the UN secretariat-general could declare that the withdrawal has fulfilled Resolution 425 had it been provided with these realities.”

Annan said he had been informed by UNIFIL “that "Israel" has withdrawn from the country in full compliance with Security Council Resolution 425.”

There was no immediate comment from UNIFIL on Annan’s announcement.

But earlier, UNIFIL spokesman Timur Goksel had told Reuters that although the inspection of the border had finished “that doesn’t mean that the verification process is completed.”

General Amin Hoteit, the head of the Lebanese delegation to the verification team, discussed several points of contention along the border with UNIFIL’s commander, General Kofi Obeng, on Friday night. The news of Annan’s announcement came during the meeting, a UN source said, “embarrassing the Lebanese considerably.”

Hoteit was due to brief officials at Baabda late on Friday night. A formal response from the presidential palace is expected on Saturday.

A UNIFIL officer admitted that the UN team had not completed its task of confirming the "Israeli" withdrawal and was planning to return to 12 disputed points on the border.

Furthermore, "Israeli" troops were seen by The Daily Star ­ still deployed on Lebanese soil ­ at Ghajar on Friday, having been overlooked by the UN verification team during its inspection of the area.

Annan’s declaration angered Lebanese officials, who were already dismayed at what they perceived as a deliberate attempt by UN special envoy Terje Roed-Larsen to push through the verification process based on his own “withdrawal line” rather than the international border referred to in 425. A senior political source described the move as “Larsen’s tricks.”

During his last trip to Lebanon 10 days ago, Larsen announced in a news conference that "Israel" was obliged to withdraw from Lebanon in compliance with a line to be established by the UN. No mention was made of the international border.

Lebanon responded by releasing a presidential memorandum to the United Nations, reasserting the country’s adherence to the international border. The memorandum was accompanied by supporting documents, some of them from the UN, confirming the legitimacy of the international border.

The political source said that Larsen was asked to attach the memorandum to Annan’s report on the withdrawal. Larsen refused, however, increasing Lebanon’s discontent with the way he was handling the issue. Lebanon subsequently released the memorandum as a separate document to the member states of the UN Security Council.

Lebanon’s position toward the “Larsen Line” hardened on Friday, with President Emile Lahoud declaring that Beirut would not consider "Israel's" withdrawal complete unless the UN-demarcated line complied with the internationally recognized border.

“Some people try to interpret Lebanon’s position in the most recent presidential memorandum to … Annan as a mere reservation and an attempt to make sure that Lebanon’s rights will be protected in the future if the "Israeli" withdrawal does not prove to have reached the internationally recognized border,” he warned in a statement. “Contrary to these renditions and interpretations, Lebanon ­ which calls for full abidance by Security Council Resolution 425 and by the text and the spirit of the UN secretary-general’s report ­ will consider the withdrawal incomplete if it conforms only with a non-existent and imaginary line.”

He said that the line of reference should be “the existing and recognized international border that is documented and well-known by the United Nations and all parties concerned.”

“This border is not subject to amendment,” he added, “and its fate cannot be postponed.”

Annan did made no mention of Lahoud’s comments in his prepared statement, saying only that he was heading to the region later to meet all the leaders “to see what the United Nations can do to consolidate and build on today’s achievement.”

The Daily Star has learned that Annan proceeded with the news conference based on guarantees from the "Israeli" government that it would withdraw troops from two disputed positions along the withdrawal line ­ near Rmeish and Misgav Am ­ by Saturday. UN sources said that the "Israelis" were in the process of relocating from these positions on Friday evening.

A Western diplomat argued that the UN had made “serious” mistakes. He said that Larsen should never have compromised on Annan’s instructions to base the line of withdrawal on the Anglo-French boundary of 1923, which was subsequently ratified by the 1949 Armistice Agreement.

“Deviating from the established border was bound to upset one party or the other,” the diplomat said. “It would appear that some of the Europeans in UN headquarters believe that the Lebanese are easy prey and can be pushed around.”


"Israeli" withdrawal "incomplete" unless reaches border: Lahoud…(3)

" The United Nations said Friday it had finished work verifying "Israel's" withdrawal from south Lebanon, but Lebanon said it would not accept anything short of "Israel's" withdrawal to the internationally recognized border.

"Lebanon would regard the "Israeli" withdrawal as incomplete if it is calculated against a fictitious, non-existent line," Lebanese President Emile Lahoud said in a statement.

"Lebanon is demanding the complete implementation, in letter and spirit, of Security Council Resolution 425 and the report of the (UN) Secretary General (Kofi Annan)" he added.

Lahoud's statement comes on the eve of schedule visits to the Middle East by both Annan and his regional envoy, Terje Roed-Larsen.

Lahoud told Annan in a four-page memorandum made public last Sunday that the United Nations had been too hasty in mapping the border to which "Israel" had to withdraw and called the UN line "fictitious."

He said Friday's new statement was designed to put an end to claims that "the sole purpose of the memorandum sent by Mr. Lahoud to Mr. Annan was to preserve Lebanon's rights even if the "Israeli" withdrawal did not go back to the recognised border."

Lebanese Lieutenant-Colonel Amin Hoteit said the major difference was over a 180 square-meter (1,935 square-feet) area in Abbassiyeh, a village he said the "Israelis" trespassed onto and destroyed. Hoteit called on the United Nations to move barbed wire so that Abbassiyeh's residents could return.

Lebanon says that UN Security Council Resolution 425 of 1978, and Annan's May 22 report, called for an "Israeli" withdrawal to the international frontier established in 1923 and confirmed in the 1949 armistice agreement between the two.

Annan's report made it clear that the UN "blue line" should not be taken as the definitive border.

Lahoud criticized Thursday those whom he said were in a rush to wrap up verification of the "Israeli" withdrawal from south Lebanon.

"We waited 22 years for the liberation of our land. How can they conceive of not being able to wait a few days to ensure the withdrawal" he said as he chaired an extraordinary cabinet session.

Information Minister Anwar al-Khalil said Lahoud was responding to those who held Lebanon responsible for delays in the United Nation's verification work, which is required by the Security Council.

UN experts started work checking the line of withdrawal on June 8, and completed it on the "Israeli" side a week ago, but it has been held up on the Lebanese side by disagreements over alleged "Israeli" encroachments.

Work was further held up Thursday after "Israeli" troops fired warning shots at the cartographers.

They resumed work Friday under the protection of two UN armoured cars and UN officials in Beirut said later the work had been completed.

But they added that some of the points were inspected by helicopter and Lebanese army experts still wished to visit "a few of them" on foot, which meant they could not officially confirm the withdrawal for several hours.


Enemy soldiers in Ghajar defy so-called ‘complete departure’…(4)

""Israeli" troops were still deployed north of the United Nations’ line of withdrawal at Ghajar on Friday, having gone unnoticed by the UN border verification team which visited the disputed area.

Their presence clearly contradicted UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan’s declaration that the "Israelis" have implemented Resolution 425 and totally withdrawn from Lebanon.

The "Israeli" soldiers were spotted less than an hour after the UN team ­ accompanied by Lebanese Army officers ­ verified the line of withdrawal stretching northeast from the center of Ghajar. The team said they were satisfied that there was no "Israeli" military activity north of the withdrawal line.

But The Daily Star saw several "Israeli" soldiers in military vehicles and in an observation post located at the northern end of Ghajar ­ which now falls on Lebanese territory.

The verification team consisted of two delegations: one from the Lebanese Army, headed by General Amin Hoteit, which was demarcating Lebanon’s borders with "Israel" and "Israeli"-occupied Syria. The second consisted of officers from UNIFIL and the Observer Group Lebanon, part of the UN Truce Supervision Organization. The task of the UN group was to confirm that "Israel" has withdrawn from Lebanese territory in accordance with Resolution 425.

The team arrived at the Abbassieh crossing on Friday morning for a second attempt to inspect the withdrawal line. On Thursday, the border inspection was canceled after an "Israeli" soldier fired shots at UN personnel as they attempted to pass through the gate. The "Israeli" Army subsequently apologized for the shooting and said a patrol had fired warning shots at “trespassers.”

Brigadier General Jim Sreenan, UNIFIL’s deputy commander, said he was hopeful the team could reach their final destination ­ just above Shibaa village ­ by the end of the day.

“I’m pretty confident we’ll do it today,” he said. “We’re not anticipating any problems.”

Reporters were prevented from crossing to the other side of the fence as the team checked the location of the border marker ­ two stacked concrete blocks painted in UN blue. A bearing was taken from the marker following the line of withdrawal to Ghajar, 1.5 kilometers to the southwest. The line effectively placed almost two-thirds of the village inside Lebanon.

An "Israeli" jeep pulled up 100 meters down the road, on the other side of the withdrawal line, to watch the proceedings.

Hoteit said he accepted the delineation of the blue line but noted that an "Israeli" position was located 118 meters inside Lebanese territory.

The outpost in question was demolished by the "Israelis" last week. But, for a few days afterward, "Israeli" soldiers continued to watch the Abbassieh gate, some 200 meters to the north, from the bulldozed ramparts of the outpost.

After checking the area, Sreenan said there did not appear to be any soldiers in the post.

“We have marked the (withdrawal) line. There’s no apparent sign of "Israeli" activity,” he said.

Sreenan added that the team had not entered the outpost due to the large number of land mines in the area.

A UN officer said that the team had spotted broken water pipes by the post which appeared to have been linked to the Wazzani springs, 2 kilometers to the west below Ghajar.

Hoteit announced that the Lebanese Army had just recuperated 4,000 dunums of Lebanese territory

Apparently satisfied with the inspection, the team boarded their UN vehicles and headed for their next destination, near Kfar Shouba on the border between Lebanon and "Israeli"-occupied Syria.

Three former residents of Abbassieh smashed the padlock securing the gate and swung it open. A Hizbullah supporter stepped through and gingerly planted a party flag on the edge of the road. One of the Abbassieh residents let out a feeble cheer for the newly liberated territory but his voice was carried away by the warm breeze.

However, it was only with the departure of the UN team that it gradually became clear that not all "Israeli" troops had departed the newly reclaimed Lebanese territory.

Scanning the area north of the withdrawal line, a military vehicle could be seen driving on what appeared to be Lebanese land on the edge of Ghajar. Clearer evidence of a transgression emerged, however, as we approached Ghajar alongside the existing border fence.

Six "Israeli" soldiers lay on top of a water tower, shaded by a canopy of camouflaged netting. One of them manned a light machine gun while two others observed our approach through binoculars. An "Israeli" Army light vehicle, known as a humvee, came into view just a few meters from the fence as we reached the edge of the village. The humvee was parked with the engine running and headlights switched on. The occupants could barely be seen through the smoked glass windscreen.

A small military troop carrier drove up and stopped on the other side of the fence. The back door swung open and a soldier leaned out.

“Take a picture of me,” he said grinning. “Put me in your paper.”

Three residents of Ghajar approached the fence, willing to talk.

“The "Israelis" have given us five minutes only to talk to you,” said Ahmad Khatib.

He reiterated the objections of the residents to the village being split between Lebanon and "Israeli"-occupied Syria.

“We’ll never leave our land behind. The village must remain whole and with all our land,” he said.

What about the "Israeli" soldiers in Ghajar? Why are they still there?

“The "Israelis" are putting up new defenses along their border,” Khatib said uncomfortably.

Do the "Israelis" intend to build a fence through the village?

“We have no contact with the "Israeli" soldiers,” he replied.

The five minutes were up. The residents left and we walked back to the Abbassieh gate with the "Israeli" soldiers watching us every step of the way.

UNIFIL had no comment to make on the continued presence of "Israeli" soldiers in Ghajar.


Larsen makes an unscheduled trip to Beirut…(5)

"UN special Middle East envoy Terje Roed-Larsen is to make an unscheduled visit to Lebanon tomorrow, ahead of UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan's planned trip to the region.

Annan cancelled a meeting with French President Jacques Chirac which was scheduled for this afternoon in Paris. Officials said Annan was held back in New York. The UN chief is to begin an eight-day visit to the Middle East on Saturday to discuss "Israel's" pullout from Lebanon and ways to preserve peace on the Lebanon-"Israel" border. Annan will hold talks with top officials in Beirut on Monday and is also expected to visit southern Lebanon. 


Pullout deaths ‘tragic mistake'…(6)

"Israel's" army admitted on Friday to committing a “tragic mistake” when an "Israeli" tank fired upon a BBC television car, killing a Lebanese driver during the army’s withdrawal from the South last month.

Abed Taqqoush was killed on May 23 when a tank shell hit his parked Mercedes. Veteran BBC reporter Jeremy Bowen and Reuters cameraman Malek Kenaan were filming 100 meters from the car when it was hit.

After investigating the incident the army found that the tank crew had acted “according to procedures based on the circumstances that it found itself at that time.”

The statement continued to say that "Israeli" soldiers mistook the car’s passengers for “terrorists who were preparing to fire anti-tank missiles.

“Afterward it was clear that a tragic mistake was made,” the report added.

But the "Israeli" Army’s statement did appease the BBC, which is conducting its own investigation into the incident.

The head of BBC news-gathering, Adrian Van Klaveren, said the BBC was “deeply dissatisfied with the "Israeli" Army investigation into the death of Abed Taqqoush.

“If they really believed that the car was being used by alleged terrorists, why attack the vehicle rather than the individuals who had just left it?” he asked in a statement.

Amnesty International is also investigating the killing of four civilians, including Taqqoush.


Trials of 2277 collaborators continue…(7)

The trials of the 2277 collaborators who had surrendered to the resistance that handed them over to the Lebanese judiciary continued on Friday.

A total of 364 former members of the "Israeli" occupation's now-defunct proxy militiawere questioned on collaboration charges on Thursday, paving the way for their trials.

Trials resumed on Friday after Monday and Wednesday sessions were canceled due to the mourning period for Syrian President Hafez Assad ­ who died on Saturday ­ and the celebration of the Prophet Mohammed's (PBUH&HF) birthday on Wednesday.

So far, 105 collaborators have been sentenced to terms mostly ranging between 12 and 18 months.


Footnotes:

1-          Manar TV, 16-6-2000.

2-          The Daily Star, 17-6-2000.

3-          AFP, 16-6-2000.

4-          The Daily Star, 17-6-2000.

5-          Future TV, 16-6-2000.

6-          The Daily Star, 17-6-2000.

7-          Manar TV, 16-6-2000.