Group Therapy in Treatment of Post traumatic
Stress Disorder in Palestinian Children

AA Thabet
Gaza Community Mental Health Programme, Gaza


 


Correspondence to:Abdel Aziz Mousa Thabet, Gaza Community Mental Health priogramme, Gaza P.O Box 1049, Tel 972 7 2865949, Fax 972 7 2824072, .

Abstract

Aim - To investigate Whether group therapy is effective in as a type of treatment for PTSD children, the proximity to the event can lead to more symptoms in children.

, and outcome of traumatic event after group therapy
A sample of 5 children of 12-16 years living in the Jablia camp in the Gaza strip was selected in the area of the accident. Children completed the Child Post Traumatic Stress Reaction Index, Impact of Events Scale, and parents completed Rutter parents scale.
Results - Children reported high rates of Post traumatic stress reactions , and deviance in behaviour by parents. This was less after 3 months of group psychotherapy.
Conclusions – Group therap for traumatized children is one of the mesaure which could be used in small scale therapy and could be applied to large number of traumatized children.
Keywords: PTSD, group therapy

Group Therapy in Treatment of Post traumatic
Stress Disorder in Palestinian Children

Introduction

Over the last 27 years Palestinian children have been exposed to a variety of traumatic events including witnessing acts of violence, beating to themselves or their relative, imprisonment, tear gas, and night raids (Abu Hein et al., 1993).
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition- Revised (DSM-III-R)(1987), diagnostic criteria for PTSD include (1) exposure to an extreme stressor outside the range of usual human experience; (2) re experiencing the traumatic event via memories, dreams, flashbacks, or distress at exposure to reminders; (3) persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma, or numbing of general responsiveness; and (4) symptoms of increased arousal, such as sleep disturbance, irritability, difficulty concentrating, hyper vigilance, and exaggerated startle response.
Howard and Gordon (1972) after the San Fernando earthquake found that some children still have symptoms one year after the traumatic event.

Terr(1981) , in her work with psychic trauma of kidnapped victims, reported about the long-lasting effects of trauma. She reported a reduction of symptoms in many cases after brief counseling.

Fredrick (1982) in his study found that in three quarters of the children, symptoms were still evidence 2 years after the traumatizing event.

Saffer (1986) reported that time limited group therapy was effective in a group of adolescents who, their friend committed suicide.

Freeman(1991) found that group therapy in a group of people affected by suicide ineffective in reaching its goal of helping those people.

Dyregrove(1994) reported the efficacy of group therapy in traumatized children due to loss of their parents.
 

The traumatic event:
On March 28, 1994, a group of children living in Jabalia camp (Gaza strip) witnessed the killing of six Fatah Hawks( The army wing of Palestine Liberation Organization in Gaza strip) by special Israeli forces. All of the six people were masked and they were shot dead on spot and all of the children saw their killings, smelt the gunfire, and heard the gunfire.
Later on they witnessed the carrying of those killed men in a black bags by Israeli’s Defense Forces.

 
Aims of the study:
1) Whether group therapy is effective in as a type of treatment for PTSD children.
2) The proximity to the event can lead to more symptoms in children.
3) Outcome of traumatic event after group therapy.
Method
In this study , six preadolescent children between the age of 12 and 16 years witnessed killing of 6 Fatah Hawks in Jabalia camp on 28th March 1994.
Case 1. A boy age 13 years, a child of family consists of, heard shooting outside his home. On going outside home he saw people in 2 cars shooting on masked people in the street. He saw one man chasing another one then he shot him on the fence of his neighbors home, the boy ran back to his home. He then saw a crowd of soldiers and blood was every where.
The actual incident involved the killing of six masked people by the special Israeli force.
Case 2. A boy age 15 years, a child of family consists of 5 brothers and 3 sisters, was standing in a video shop to borrow a cassette. A masked people were filling their car in a patrol station and of now where 2 cars stopped and men rushed out of the cars and started shooting the masked people. He hide inside the video shop and he witnessed the shooting of the masked people and he was frightening from the scene of shooting of one of those men in his head and his brain was gushing outside his skull.
Case 3. A boy age 14 years, a child of family consists of one brother and 5 sisters, watched masked people distributing leaflets on the near patrol station. A gunfire started and he hide behind the masked people car. He can not move at that moment and he saw the killing of the six people and blood was all over the street and the street was full of special Israeli force and soldiers.
Case 4. A boy age 15 years, a child of a family consists of 3 brothers and 3 sisters, watched the masked people distributing leaflets. 2 cars came and armed men came out and started shooting those masked people. He saw one gunman shooting another one on the patrol station stairs and he saw the man brain and blood were all over the stairs. He witnessed the shooting of his mother who tried to protect one of those masked people by her body. He ran from the street to his house and started to watch through a small holes in their house wall. He saw soldiers putting the bodies in black bags and they took them.

Case 5. A boy age 15 years, a child of family consists of 3 brothers and 6 sisters, heard shooting and ran to his home and through holes in their home wall he saw people laying on ground and blood around them and soldiers around. Later on he knew that 6 masked people were shot dead by the special force men.

Case 6 . A boy 15 years old, a child of family consists of

, heard shooting outside his house and his brother told him that 6 masked people were killed in the street. When he ran outside the home he saw the soldiers carrying the bodies of those masked people in black bags and blood was all over the street.
Methodology
Instruments:
1. Impact of Event Scale
This 15- item scale was developed by Horowitz, Wilner and Alvarez (1979) to measure the two most characteristic aspects of post-traumatic psychopathology, namely the strength of unpleasant, intrusive thoughts and the energy spent in trying to block them out of consciousness. The intrusive sub-scale of the Impact of Event Scale draws upon the signs and symptoms of intrusive (invading, disturbing) cognition and affects. The avoidance sub-scale of the IES draws upon avoidance behaviour, denial or the blocking of thoughts and image. It is currently the most widely used instrument in the study of PTSD in adults. It has been used with children aged 8-16 years ( Yule & Williams, 1990), where it was found that children who had survived a sea disaster found the questions meaningful and reported scores as high as those of traumatized adults. The ICES was used to screen children for PTSD ( Yule & Udwin, 1990).
The ICES was used after the gulf crisis on children in Iraq (Dyregov & Raundalen, 1991) revealed highly disturbed population of children who were exceedingly bothered by intrusive thoughts of the war. This scale was applied on the beginning of group therapy and 2 months after starting the therapy.
2. Description of Rutter Scale for completion by parents A (2)
This is a well standardized instrument (Rutter et al, 1970). The scale consists of thirty-one statements concerning the child's behaviour. The parent is asked to indicate the frequency of occurrence of the behaviour, or the degree of its severity, or the extent to which the statement applies to the child. Each item is cored 0,1, or 2, producing a total score within the range of 0-62.
The selection of children with emotional or conduct d, tow largest clinical diagnostic categories (Rutter, 1965), is a two-stage procedure:
1. Children with a total score of 13 or more are designated as showing some disorder;

2. Of these children, those with an emotional score exceeding the conduct score are designated as having 'conduct disorder". Children with equal emotional and conduct subscores remain undifferentiated, although recent studies indicate that these disorders are more like the conduct disorders than emotional disorders in terms of the associated impairment in educational attainments.

The "emotional disorder: subscore is obtained by summing up the score of items B, G, V, 6 and 15("has stomach-ache or vomiting" " has tears on arrival at school or refused to go to the building" " does he/she have any sleeping difficulty?" ; " often worried, worried about many things", and "tends to be fearful or afraid of new things or new situations").

The "conduct disorder" subscore is obtained by summing the scores of items III, 3,13, 17, and 18 (" does he/she ever steal things?"; "often destroys own or others" belongings"; "is often disobedient"; " often tells lies" and bullies other children").

3. Gaza Traumatic Event Checklist (Abu Hein et al, 1993).

The first checklist was developed by the research department of the Gaza Community Mental Health Program (G.C.M.H.P)( Appendix). The checklist consisted of 17 items covering different types of traumatic events that a Palestinian child may have been exposed to during the occupation period (tear gas, beating, witnessing the beating, breaking bones, imprisonment, siblings imprisonment, injury, night raids, humiliation, and detention) (Abu Hein et al., 1993; Summerfield, 1993). This checklist is completed by the child himself (age 6-16 years) by "Yes" or "No". The summation of traumatic events is scored according to the number of the traumatic events. Less than 5 traumatic events are rated as "few", 5-9 events are rated as "frequent", and 10 or more as "much".
4. Children Post Traumatic Stress Reaction Index (PTSD-RI)
(Pynoos et al., 1987)
Fredrick (1985) developed the Post Traumatic Stress Reaction Index to study the effects of trauma on children. The index is a PTSD scale developed from DSM-III criteria for the PTSD. This instrument designed to assess the degree of Posttraumatic symptomatology in children. He reported that 60% of disaster victims, 100% of children who had been sexually molested, and 70% of those who had been physically abused, fulfilled PTSD as defined by DSM-III (APA, 1987).
The CPTSD-RI (Appendix) is a 20-item scale designed to assess post-traumatic stress reactions of school-age children and adolescents (6-16 years) following exposure to a broad range of traumatic events. Its scores by 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 according to presence of symptoms.The scale correlates at +0.95 with persons diagnosed in clinical settings in hospitals as compared to those persons diagnosed officially by mental health personnel as having PTSD.
Previous published empirical comparisons of CPTSD-RI scores with a diagnosis of PTSD in clinical populations have suggested the following guidelines: a total score of 12-24 indicates a "mild" level of PTSD reaction; 25-39 a "moderate" level; 40-59 a "severe" level; above 60 a "very severe" reaction. Inter-rater reliability for this instrument when administered by a clinician has been reported to be excellent, with a Cohen kappa of 0.87 for inter-item agreement (Pynoos et al, 1987). Table 3.3.4.1.

The PTSDRI was standardized on 750 children and 1,350 adult cases of stress-laden events and has shown a correlation of .91 with a positive PTSD diagnosis in children (Fredrick, 1985). More recently, Shannon et al. (1994) and Lonigan et al. (1994) used the PTSDRI in a study with more than 5,500 children exposed to Hurricane Hugo. Shannon al. (1994) reported huge internal consistency values (alpha=.83) for the full instrument and values ranging from .55 to.86 for symptoms clusters corresponding to DSM-II-R, Lonigan et al. (1994) provided validity evidence for the PTSDRI by demonstrating that the presence of PTSD synptomatology assessed by the PTSDRI was strongly related to self-reported hurricane severity, degree of home damage, and continued displacement. Similarly , Shaw et al. (1995) used the instrument in a study of children 2 months after Hurricane Andrew, estimated coefficient alpha at .75, and the test-retest reliability between 2 and 8 months posthurricane was .59.

This scale was applied on the beginning of group therapy and 3 months after starting the therapy. This scale was translated to Arabic and validity and reliability testing was done and adapted to Arabic cultures.

Results:

Time (Starting of group therapy)

1- Gaza Trauma Scale:

As shown in Table 1, all children experienced tear gas, beating, witnessed beating to relatives, humiliation to self and others, and nightraids.
2. Children Post Traumatic Stress Reaction Index:
As shown in Table 2, all children scored moderate to severe degree of post traumatic stress disorder. The higher scores were in Mahmoud and Ramzy and this could be because they witnessed closely the killing and Mahmoud saw his mother shooting infront of his eyes.
As it shown in table 3 all of them still shown moderate post traumatic stress disorder symptoms compared to the start of therapy in which they showed severe post traumatic stress disorder symptoms.
3- Impact of Events scale
Most of them scored high degree in avoidance and intrusion symptoms of PTSD.
One month later they showed less intrusion and avoidance symptoms compared to starting the therapy time.
4- Rutter parent’s scale
Four of them scored more higher than cut point in Rutter scale.
Three months later chiltren were scored less in this time, however it is not a significant one.
Conclusion:
Clinical impression and descriptive data from the group of traumatized children treated by group treated by group therapy here seen to support the notion that group therapy is an effective therapy in traumatized children to some extend and this was apparent in observing the decline in scoring of PTSD , avoidance and intrusion scores after three months of therapy.
However ,in looking to Rutter scale there was no much difference in period of three months and this support other opinions that Rutter scale is the fact the most of those children experiences. Another reason of no change of Ruttter scale is the fact the most of those children were chronically traumatized and some of the neurotic and behaviour problems they have are due to the previous traumatic experiences.

From our observation during the therapy sessions some of those children were obsessed with the Special Israeli Forces especially Mohammed.

The therapy session was done in a transition period between the end of the Israelis occupation to Gaza strip and coming of the Palestinian police and it was apparent in their drawings the change from pictures full of killing , and blood to anther shining picture of the Palestinian colored flags and slogans welcoming the Palestinian police.

Acknowledgment:

Thanks to all those helped my in this research especially Mr.Jaser Salah who carried with me the group therapy sessions and all workers in Gaza Community Mental Health Program -Jaballia Branch , without them this peace of paper will not come in this shape.

References:

Abu Hein, F., Qouta, S., Thabet, A., and El Sarraj, E.(1993). Trauma and Mental health of children in Gaza. British Medical Journal, 306, 1129-1130.

Dyregrov, A., and Raundalen, M.(1991). The Impact of the Gulf Crisis on Children in Iraq. Paper presented at Ist International conference” Palestine and Peace” Gaza Strip.

Dyregrov, A.(1994) Childhood Bereavement. Consequences and Therapeutic Approaches. Association of Child Psychology Review & Newsletter, 16 173-182.

Fredrick, C. J.(1982). Children of disaster. paper read at the International Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and allied Professions, Dublin, Ireland.

Freeman, S. (1991). Group Facilitation of the Grieving Process With Those Bereaved by Suicide. Journal of Counseling & Development, 69, 328-331.

Hor, M., Wilner, N., and Alvapez, W.(1979). Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209-218.

Howard, S. H. and Gordon, N. S.(1972). Mental Health intervention in major disaster. NIMH research grant. MH 21649-09. Child Guidance Clinic. San Fernando. Calif.

Nadir, K., Pynoos, R., Fairbanks, L., and Frederick, C.(1990). Children’s PTSD Reaction One Year After a Sniper Attack at Their School. and Behaviour. Longman: London.

Nader, K., Fairbanks, L., Al-Ajeel, M., and Al-Asfour, A.(1993). A preliminary study of PTSD and grief among the children of Kuwait following the Gulf crisis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 407-416.

Pynoos, R., Frederick, C., and Nader, K.(1987). Life threat and post traumatic stress in school children. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 1057-1063.

Rutter, M., Tizard, J., and Whitmore, K.(1970). Education, Health and Behaviour. Longman: London.

Rutter, M., Graham, P.(1967). A children’s behaviour questionnaire for completion by teachers: preliminary findings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, 1-11.

Yule, W., and Williams, R.(1990). Posstress reactions in children. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 3(2),279-295.

Yule, W., Udwin, O., and Murdoch. (1990). The “Jupitor” sinking: Effects on children’s fears, depression to the first European Conference on Traumatic Stress Research, Lincoln, August.

Table 1

Children exposed to different types of trauma
Types of traumatic event
No
 %
1.Tear Gas 
2.Beating 
3.Witnessing beating of relatives 
4. Breaking bones
5. Breaking bones of relatives 
6. Imprisonment 
7. Imprisonment of close relatives 
8. Injury 
9. Night raids 
10. Humiliation 
11. Family members humiliation 
12. Detention 
6










4
100%  100% 
100% 
0.00 
66.7% 
0.00 
 66.7% 
 16.7% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
66.7%
 

Table 2:

Differences in CPTSD-RI scoring applied to 6 traumatized Palestinian children three months after trauma and group therapy
 
Children PTS Reaction Index
 
Time 1
Time 2
Mahmoud
Ramzy 
Khalid 
Ahmad 
Mohammed 
Yousif
56
51
49
47
47
44
30
34
35
31
39
44
 
 
Table 3:
Differences in Impact of Events Scale scoring applied to 6 traumatized Palestinian children three months after trauma and group therapy
 
Intrusion
Avoidance
Name
Time 2
Time 1
Time 2
Time 1
 
14
20 
17 
12 
31 
12
30
31 
24 
27 
27 
22
6
10 
17 
11 
22 
17
27
19 
29 
25 
31 
27
Mahmoud
Ramzy 
Khalid 
Ahmad 
Mohammed 
Yousif
 
Table 4:
Differences in caseness rated by Rutter Parent’s scale applied to 6 traumatized Palestinian children three months after trauma and group therapy
 
Time 1 
Time 2
Mahmoud
22
15
Ramzy
25
17
Khalid
21
22
Ahmad
12
5
Mohammed
21
21
Yousif
7
16
 

 CONTACT   HOME
GCMHP, Gaza Palestine P.O. Box 1049 Tel: + 972 7 865949  Fax: + 972 7 824072