ÈÓã Çááå ÇáÑÍãä ÇáÑÍíã
Bismillahi al-Rahman al-Raheem
An analysis by Hizb-ut-Tahrir covering the recent explosions in Kenya and the American response.
On August 7th 1998, two explosions took place, one of which was at the American embassy in Nairobi, the capital of Kenya and the other at the American embassy in Dar-es-Salaam, the capital of Tanzania. On August 20th 1998, America carried out missile attacks on a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan and on five locations in Afghanistan, and one location in Pakistan near the Afghan border.
Sandy Berger, the American National Security Advisor, stated that the military plan to strike Afghanistan and Sudan was prepared five days after the attack on the American embassies. The American investigators stated on August 19th 1998, that the investigation regarding the explosions at the two embassies was progressing but had not yet reached a satisfactory result, though Clinton said that the investigation had reached a convincing result.
This contradiction between the statements of the investigators and Clinton, and the statement of the National Security Advisor that the plan was prepared on August 12th 1998, indicated that Clinton had decided to attack regardless of the investigation and its result. The English newspaper, " The Independent" wrote on August 23rd 1998, that Clinton knew from American intelligence that the Sudanese pharmaceutical plant (Ash-Shifa) was a non-military plant and that it had no relationship with manufacturing chemical weapons, yet he ordered to strike it.
The legal advisor for the plant (who is of the Sudanese opposition) confirmed that the plant did not deal, in any manner, with matters of chemical weapons. The Jordanian engineers who know that plant well confirm that the plant didn't produce anything except pharmaceutical products. Moreover, the Sudanese government called for a committee of experts from the United Nations to carry out investigations and to confirm to the world the fallacy of Clinton's claims, and that the plant had no trace of chemical weapons or of substances which could be transformed into chemical weapons.
So why did Clinton order to strike the pant when he knew that it had no relationship with the production of weapons or the production of substances that are used in the manufacture of chemical weapons ? "Al Mushahid ad-Dowliy", on August 23rd 1998, answered this question in saying " The destruction of the plant is payment for the bill of (Monicagate)." Clinton considers that his destiny looks like the destiny of Nixon. His supporters claim that there is a right wing conspiracy which endeavours to remove him from the Presidency. The independent investigator, Starr, chases Clinton relentlessly. He called Monica Lewinsky to testify infront of the grand jury after Clinton presented his testimony. It appears that Starr wants to prove that Clinton lied in his testimony of August 17th 1998 and he wants to include in his report to the congress enough evidence to remove Clinton from the Presidency. It seems that the removal became a nightmare for Clinton which made him stumble in his actions and decisions.
In addition to this, American foreign policy has been afflicted with failure in many regions. In Kosovo, America was unable to use NATO force to strike against the Serbs and to strengthen the KLA because of the stubbornness and unsteadiness of Russian, British, and French positions. In the Middle East, Netanyahu took advantage of the Whitehouse's preoccupation with the Clinton scandal and ordered the building of 200 residential units and 200 tourist units in the Golan Heights. In Iraq, the problem of Saddam's refusal to deal with the inspectors returned, and with it resurfaced America's embarrassment.
The international struggle over Africa intensified, and the two American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed.
These factors drove the Clinton administration to
strike Sudan and Afghanistan as a means of restoring pride in
front of the American and worldly public opinion after these
failures, also as a sort of propaganda operation in front
of the American people to gain their support in his trial to
remove the danger of impeachment. Is he going to survive or not?
America claims that she is fighting terrorism and calls the
world's governments to co-operate with her in fighting terrorism.
An international conference was held in Sharm-al Shaikh (Egypt)
to fight terrorism. Now there is a call for a new conference to
make decisions to fight terrorism. But what is terrorism ? Alex
Schmidt, in his book Political Terrorism says " At this
moment there are more than 100 definitions used in international
circles and this exists even inside the American administration
which has undertaken
the leadership of the campaign against terrorism". Isn't the
action which America carried out itself terrorism? Rather, the
ugliest terrorism, the terrorism of the arrogant state.
Yesterday America used to support the fight in
Afghanistan against the regime supported by the Soviet Union.
America did not call that fight terrorism, rather she called it
Jihad. While the fight against the Israeli occupation, and the
fight against the American occupation of Saudia Arabia, the Gulf
and others, she is pleased to call terrorism. Had America, as she
claims, been committed to
International Law, she would not have engaged in striking the
pharmaceutical plants in Khartoum nor would she have engaged in
striking Afghanistan. Rather, she would have brought the case to
the Security Council since she claims to have
convincing evidence. The Security council would take the
appropriate punitive measures.
O Muslims ! America deals with the Islamic lands as if they are her own farm. She deals with the rulers of the Muslims as if they are her servants, rather her slaves. She deals with the Islamic peoples as if they are tools. She exploits them for her service. So she plunders the wealth of the Islamic lands by manipulating Muslims to carry out this plunder for her as Israel manipulates the people of Palestine to build her the settlements in their own land and at the expense of their own rights. This is not the first aggression of America against the Islamic Ummah. Yesterday she hit Iraq and she has laid siege to it . She also hit Libya and laid siege to it. She helped the Jews to steal Palestine and to expel its people and she continues to help them. She occupies Saudia Arabia and imposes upon the Gulf her hegemony so that she plunders the oil and the wealth from their treasures. Look at Saudia Arabia and the gulf countries, how they sink under the burden of debt despite their huge wealth. And all of this is because of the hegemony of America and her allies imposed upon the region of the Islamic world.
America is a true enemy to the Islamic Ummah. Her
allies who share with her in the aggression against the Islamic
Ummah or who support her in this aggression like the English and
the French and others, are true enemies to the Islamic Ummah. It
is incorrect to treat the enemy as a friend. It is only the fool
who treats the enemy as a friend. And the result of doing so will
be evil. Allah (swt) advised
us by saying "Shaytan is an enemy to you, so you have to
take him as an enemy".
We do not mean that by taking America as an enemy
that we bomb the embassies or attack the people. Because Islam
orders us to protect the covenant of protection for whoever we
gave it to. But when America hits us on our own ground and
destroys our factories and homes and kills us without respecting
any ties or covenants as if we are insects that have no sanctity
or dignity, without any justification, in addition to her
previous aggression, what would the world expect of Muslims?
However, we do not call for the Islamic peoples to take revenge
from those to whom we gave a covenant of protection in our lands.
We rather say the Muslims rulers must treat America and those who
supported her as an arrogant enemy, by severing the
relationships, closing down the embassies, stopping all trade and
all dealings, expelling their citizens, and freezing their assets.
More importantly, the Muslim's rulers must abolish any more
political treaties and expel all military forces and to close
down any military . They must also close their waters, lands and
spaces to entry or passage from any of the enemy states. They
have also to break off any influence and remove any agent or spy
for these states in the Islamic lands. This position is required
from every ruler in the Islamic lands, not only from the ruler of
the country which was the target of aggression. This is because
Muslims are one single Ummah. The Prophet (saw) said " The
Muslims are like the body, if one of its members
complained, the other members will respond in sleeplessness and
fever". So aggression against any Islamic land is considered
as an aggression against all Muslims.
It may be said that the Muslims rulers will not
implement any of these actions, and the maximum thing they
will do is shy condemnation as a means of discharging the anger
of their peoples. To that we say, yes, this is what is expected
of these rulers. In this situation arises the role of the people,
not in exploding the embassies and killing the foreigners, but
rather in changing these rulers. For it
is error and complacency in the obligation to leave
in power these puppet, vicious (Fasiq) rulers who govern with
Kufr and implement the policies of America or other Kufr
countries. Such a ruler, who has in his control the army, the
police, and all the forces and institutions and in whose hand
lies the implementation of the laws, the funds of the country,
who is occupying the seat of power. It is haram to leave in power
such a ruler who is spreading corruption in the land, and
protecting the influence of the Americans and their allies, and
to distract oneself from that by challenging a little of the
Kuffar's influence.
But can the Islamic peoples change their rulers?
Yes, definitely. America and its allies will never be able to
protect the despicable puppet ruler from his people, particularly
when such a ruler is a coward who protects his own
interests and the interests of a foreign country and discards the
interests of his people, the pride of his people and his country
and the ideology, Islam, of his people.
Yes, now comes the role of the Islamic people. It has been a long
time since the Islamic peoples have lost their role . They kept
silent about Musatafa Kemal when he destroyed the Khilafah by the
help of the English and the other Kufr states. They kept silent
about the colonial states as they ivided the Islamic land into
small pieces to make it easy for them to rule according to the
principle of
divide and rule. They kept silent about the implementation of
Kufr systems upon them instead of the Sharia' of the Qur'an. They
kept silent about their insignificant rulers established by the
kuffar so
as to be guards for them who protect their interests. They kept
silent about their humiliation by the Jews, the Americans, the
English, the French and other colonial Kufr states and they kept
silent about poverty, deprivation, while they witnesses their
huge wealth plundered. We remember in this regard the saying of
Muhammad (saw). It is about the gathering of nations around us
like those
gathering around a feast. Somebody asked "Is it because we
will be few at that time ? " He (saw) said "Rather you
will be many at that time but you will be like the foam on the
ocean . . .and Allah (swt) will take from the chest of your
enemies the fear of you and will hrow in your hearts Al Wahan"
Somebody asked "O Messenger of Allah, what is Al Wahan ?"
He (saw) said "It is to love the Dunya and to hate the death."
Now America doesn't fear us and the Jews ( the most cowardly
people) do not fear us, and the rest of the Kuffr countries do
not fear us. And we hate the death and we love the dunya despite
what it has for us of shame and humiliation.
But a new dawn is rising over the Islamic Ummah. She has started to quest for the return of Islam as her way of life, so as to come back to her previous might and glory. Her sons have started to work for establishing the Khilafah to restore Islam as a system for life, state and society. Many of her sons are not distracted by the dunya, nor do they hate death nor fear it, rather they seek Shahada.
O Muslims ! Clinton, the man of scandals, wants to teach us Islam. He says resistance against America is terrorism which Islam rejects. Working towards establishing the Islamic State which governs with the revelation of Allah (swt) is fundamentalism which Islam rejects and the surrender of Palestine and Al-Quds to Jews is tolerance that Islam accepts and submission to America so that she plunders the wealth of the Gulf and Saudia Arabia and control over the sacred places of Muslims is a policy that Islam accepts.
O Muslims ! America and other Kuffr States forbid
the Muslims from possessing Atomic weapon or any weapons of mass
destruction. While America and other Kuffr states including
Israel are allowed to possess these weapons. Forbidding Muslims
from possessing Atomic weapons and weapons of mass destruction is
to keep Muslims weak, so that America, Britain, France impose
their hegemony upon Muslims and Islamic lands so that Muslims
will not be able to establish the
Khilafah and restore the rule by what Allah (swt)
revealed and so that they don't return to their previous might
and glory and so that they don't remove America and her allies
from the region of the
Islamic world.
O Muslims ! The world will not recognise you until you become a real power feared by others. And you will not become such a power unless you unite. And you will not unite unless you hold by the rope of Allah (Islam) and establish the Khilafah and implement Islam. "Hold all of you to the rope of Allah and don't separate yourselves".
6 Jumada Al Awal 1419.
28-8-1998
Hizb ut-Tahrir