- Wielding the Ax of Bitterness
- Dear viewer
- Extreme Racism in Orlando Sentinel


Dear viewer,
Thank-you for your email regarding 'When Peace
Died', shown on Saturday 18th November on BBC 2.

With regard to the use of the word "disputed land"
instead of "Occupied Territories"
We apologise if we caused any offence.
Technically the West Bank is correctly described as part of the
"occupied territories" as laid down in UN Resolution 242. What we were
trying to indicate at this point in the programme was that in the historical
and religious sense this area was disputed as far as opinion on the ground
is concerned - i.e.Palestinians and Israelis. This section of the film then
went on to put those opposing views clearly as voiced by the various
interviewees on both sides. We were trying to convey a sense, in a more
documentary style programme, of the local feelings surrounding the issue.
We are fully aware of the status of this area and indeed you will
see that elsewhere in the programme we refer to "the tyranny of
occupation" when describing areas covered under UN Resolution 242.

Once more we apologise for any offence caused in this matter.

Best Wishes
Jane Corbin, John Thynne and Frank Smith.
Correspondent.
BBC 2

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MarwanTarazi
> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 9:53 PM
> To: correspondent@bbc.co.uk
> Subject: "disputed Territory"
> Dear Sir,
> BBC keeps referring to the West Bank and Gaza as "disputed territory".
> Under United Nations  resolutions and the Geneva Conventions, the West
> Bank and Gaza are  OCCUPIED Territories.  They are OCCUPIED by Israel.
> There is no dispute about that.  You can only consider them disputed if
> BBC supports the illegal position of the occupier. In this case, you
> have lost all of your reporting objectivity and adherance to
> international laws and justice.
> Marwan Tarazi
> Jerusalem
>
--------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If
you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not
use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately.
The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not
the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated.
-------------------- ends ------------------
Back to Top


ADC Action Alert: Protest Extreme Racism in Orlando Sentinel

Media@adc.org   November 27, 2000 8:38:15 PM EST

An article published The  Orlando  Sentinel  by  Stan  K.  Sujka,
president of the Holocaust Center in Maitland, Fl, contains  some
of  the  most  vicious  and  hypocritical   racist   attacks   on
Palestinian children killed by Israeli soldiers yet published. It
depicts them as hate-crazed tools of their parents, who want them
to be killed by Israeli occupation  troops  in  order  to  damage
Israel's  reputation.  Worst  of  all,  this  intense  racism  is
presented as an attack on racism and hatred in general and a plea
for tolerance. If anything, however, this  venomous  screed  tops
even  Scott  Shuger's  notorious  outburst  in  Slate  for  anti-
Palestinian hatred run amok. While  this  outrageous  example  of
blaming the victim is particularly low-down  and  shameless,  the
absurd argument that Palestinians are deliberately sending  their
children out to be killed is wide-spread and must  be  thoroughly
debunked. Feel free to use the letter to the  Sentinel  from  ADC
Communications Director Hussein Ibish as a model  and  please  cc
all letters to adc@adc.org.

ACTION REQUESTED:

Please let the Sentinel know that we are not  fooled  by  Sujka's
double-speak, that even  during  this  period  of  extreme  anti-
Palestinian hatred this is one of the most  vicious articles  yet
published, and that  the  Sentinel  should  be  ashamed  to  have
published such bile.

Mail your comments to:
Letters to the Editor
The Orlando Sentinel
633 N. Orange Ave., Orlando, Fla. 32801-1349
Or fax: (407) 420-5286
Or email <insight@orlandosentinel.com>

The Sentinel says that:
"To be considered for publication,  your  letter  should  be  150
words or fewer and must include your name,  address  and  daytime
and evening telephone numbers."

TEXT OF EXTREME RACIST ARTICLE IN THE SENTINEL:

No quick or easy cure for hate
By Stan K. Sujka
Special to the Sentinel

Published in The Orlando Sentinel on November 26, 2000

Hate is like a virus. In the most innocent way, like the "common"
cold, hate comes into the host and consumes the person. It  takes
over, much like acquired immune deficiency syndrome.

It kills!

Hate is as deadly as any physical virus.

The hate germ, fed to children  by  their  mothers  and  fathers,
encourages kids to throw rocks and Molotov cocktails  at  Israeli
soldiers. These children are fed hate  by  the  same  adults  who
chauffeur them to the riot areas.

And when some inevitably die,  the  so-called  parents  feed  the
corpses of their children  to  the  world's  public,  making  the
disease more widespread.

What else but hate would drive parents to put their own offspring
into the path of gunfire?

If uncontrolled, this virus of hate becomes ever  more  powerful.
Like a cancer, it grows by feeding on itself.

Eventually, the hate virus becomes so powerful that people  don't
care about themselves. Hate consumes them.

Explosives are strapped on young kids so they can kill themselves
and as many people as they can.

And in their rabid rage of hate, as in the USS Cole explosion off
Yemen, the terrorists kill themselves while the spreaders of hate
watch in safety behind a shroud of cowardice.

The hate virus can become so powerful that it can  consume  whole
nations, such as Germany during the Holocaust, Kosovo during  the
recent genocide and parts  of  Africa,  with  tribal  elimination
during the past few years.

Hate has taken over the lives of entire societies and has  driven
them to death or near extinction.

The  closeness  of  the  recent  presidential  election  and  the
subsequent court fights and  squabbles  over  counting  votes  in
Florida threaten our own society.  You  can  feel  the  pulse  of
hatred between Democrats and Republicans. People  on  both  sides
are stirring up animosities that will be difficult to heal.

We can fight this hate, just  as  we  fight  AIDS.  Unfortunately
there is not an easy cure.

The medication for hate is education and knowledge. We must  talk
to our children and teach them that hate is bad. To hate a person
because of his or her religion, race or  origin  is  intolerable.
Children must be told.

We must speak out against  hate  because,  by  being  silent,  we
condone it. Then silence is the mask that gives hate its stealth.

We have witnessed how powerful this medicine of education  is  in
our country. Within my own lifetime, we have moved from a  nation
of absolute segregation to a more tolerant and just society.

We must never stop fighting the hate virus. Ignore  it  and  hate
will spring back to its pattern  of  preying  on  the  innocents.
Until we get the disease under control, all we can do is pity the
children.

Stan K. Sujka, M.D., a urologist, is president of  the  Holocaust
Center in Maitland.

TEXT OF ADC LETTER TO ORLANDO SENTINEL:

11/27/00
Letters to the Editor
Orlando Sentinel

To the Editor:

I thought I had seen it all, but "No quick or easy cure for hate"
by Stan K. Sujka (November 26, 2000) beggars the imagination  for
hypocrisy  and  Orwellian  double-speak.  This   article,   which
purports to be an attack on racism is in fact  one  of  the  most
racist screeds published in any American  paper  for  years.  Its
main purpose appears to be the rationalization of the shooting of
over 70 unarmed Palestinian children  in  the  past  7  weeks  by
Israeli occupation troops in the Occupies Territories.

Sujka claims that, driven  by  anti-Israeli  hatred,  Palestinian
parents actually want their children  to  be  killed  by  Israeli
troops  in  order  to  make  Israel  look  bad.  "And  when  some
inevitably die," he  writes,  "the  so-called  parents  feed  the
corpses of their children  to  the  world's  public,  making  the
disease more widespread." Note the deep  compassion  Sujka  shows
here for  the  dead  children  and  their  grieving  parents.  By
presenting this insane argument,  Sujka  is  repeating  the  same
claims made by southern racists who turned  the  dogs  and  water
cannons on the children of Birmingham  during  the  civil  rights
movement. He is singing the same song as the white South Africans
who shot down black children at  Sharpville  and  Soweto.  He  is
exposing  his  own  absolute  inability  to  empathize  with  the
Palestinians who have suffered under 33 years of  brutal  Israeli
occupation and their need  to  live  in  freedom.  Moreover,  his
overtly racist argument holds  that  Palestinian  parents  simply
love their kids less than other people, and who become  "the  so-
called parents" because their children were murdered by occupying
soldiers.

Sujka's article is  a  pathetic  attempt  to  cover  up  for  the
outrageous abuses of  an  army  of  foreign  occupation  that  is
shooting down children in the streets  by  the  score,  which  he
whitewashes with the shameless euphemism "some  inevitably  die."
If any other army was wiping out children, no one would  for  one
moment  consider  blaming,  not  the  heavily  armed  troops  who
murdered  them,  but  their  bereaved  parents.  Sujka  does  not
acknowledge that Palestinians living under Israeli occupation  in
East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza have no recognizable civil
or legal rights, have no citizenship, have  no  right  to  travel
freely in their own land and who live in a giant Israeli  prison,
might be motivated by something  other  than  hatred  to  protest
their total lack of freedom. And if they do protest, Sujka blames
them for getting shot  by  a  foreign  army,  even  if  they  are
children.

Could it be that Dr. Sujka, president of the Holocaust Center  in
Maitland, is such a fanatical supporter of Israel that  he  truly
believes that even when Israeli troops shoot dozens of  children,
they have done  no  wrong?  Or  is  it  just  that,  rather  than
admitting  that  Israel  is  indiscriminately  shooting   people,
including children,  to  brutally  suppress  a  popular  uprising
against an occupation that should have ended  years  ago,  he  is
cynically resorting to  racist  arguments  blaming  the  victims?
Either  way,  if  hatred  truly  is  a  virus,  then  Sujka   has
demonstrated that he has  one  of  the  most  advanced  cases  on
record. The Sentinel should be ashamed  to  have  published  such
bile.

Yours,
Hussein Ibish
Communications Director, ADC

American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee
4201 Connecticut Ave., N.W., Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20008, U.S.A.
Tel: (202) 244-2990
Fax: (202) 244-3196
E-mail: adc@adc.org
Web : http://www.adc.org

Back to Top


Wielding the Ax of Bitterness

Israelis chop down Palestinians' precious olive trees, insisting
it's retaliation for rocks being hurled at settlers.

Michael Browning, Larry Kaplow - Cox News Service
The Atlanta Journal and Constitution  Nov 29, 2000

Hares, Israel --- The Palestinian villagers heard the power  saws
at midnight, racketing up the stony terraces to the  hill-perched
village of Hares. It is where Joshua,  the  Hebrew  conqueror  of
Canaan in the Old Testament, is buried in ancient Samaria, on the
modern West Bank, the "Timnath Heres" of Joshua 33:29.

When Ali Abed Daoud Jaber, 76, awoke the next morning,  he  found
he was ruined. More than 400 olive trees were  cut  down  by  the
Israeli  army  along  the  highway  leading   to   three   Jewish
settlements. At least 110 were his. His entire olive orchard  lay
felled on the stone-strewn ground.

"Where is God?" the old man screamed, gesturing with his cane  as
villagers tried to calm him. "They cut down trees my  grandfather
tended! Trees hundreds  of  years  old!  I  depend  on  my  trees
completely.. . . What will I eat now? What will I drink?"

"He is become without a brain since he  saw  this,"  said  Nasfat
Khufash, who belongs to a  rural  development  committee  in  the
vicinity. "He was sitting in the middle of the road, crying, this
morning."

The twisted trunks of the  massacred  trees  rose  as  branchless
spikes from the  loamy  brown  earth.  One,  about  8  inches  in
diameter, revealed more than 70 growth rings when the sawdust was
brushed off its surface. Lopped  olive  branches  lay  in  heaps,
their  feathery  silver-green  leaves  rustling  in  the  breeze,
beneath a sky as blue as a gas flame.

The destroyed trees lent an air of Old Testament wrath to the  2-
month-old struggle between Israelis  and  Palestinians.  So  far,
more than 280 have been killed, all but 35 of them  Palestinians.
Even olive trees have become targets in the cycle of  provocation
and reprisal. Some 4,495 olive trees had been cut down as of Nov.
9,  according  to  figures  kept  by  the  Palestinian   National
Authority's Ministry of Environmental Affairs.

Hares is in the West Bank, which was captured by  Israel  in  the
1967 Middle East war. Israel has established more than 150 Jewish
settlements in the occupied territory.

The village has been roadblocked by the Israeli army,  preventing
people from taking olives to market or to oil presses outside the
village, Khufash said. Losses from destroyed, rotted or  unpicked
crops in Palestinian areas amount to $  120  million  this  year,
according to the Palestinian Economic Council for Development and
Reconstruction.

Jewish settlers driving past the felled trees yelled  insults  at
foreign reporters.

"What are you doing here, you rubbish?" one shouted.

"Take pictures! Take pictures!" called another, sarcastically.

Interviewed later, the settlers  complained  angrily  that  Hares
village children were throwing  stones  at  their  cars  as  they
passed by, using the olive groves for cover. One settler showed a
deep dent on his van just  above  the  windshield.  Another  came
over, cursing, and tried  to  kick  in  the  car  window  of  the
reporters'  vehicle,  just   for   talking   to   the   aggrieved
Palestinians.

But the villagers were angry, too. They said the army's  response
was a devastating blow, out of proportion to  the  situation  and
punishing adults for the actions of children.

They took reporters to a site 100 yards from the  highway,  where
20 trees had been cut down, seemingly too far from  the  road  to
serve any security purpose.

An olive tree in these parts is  like  an  interest-bearing  bank
account, yielding up to 35 pounds of fruit year after year. Olive
harvesting is a time- honored family ritual.  The  velvety-purple
fruit is knocked  off  branches  with  sticks,  or  plucked  from
ladders onto underlying tarpaulins by stroking each leafy  branch
gently.

One farmer, Abdullah Hamed Suleiman, 62, who  lost  71  trees  to
Israeli chain saws Thursday, said the destroyed trees represented
$ 4,000 a year in income, from olive oil he sells to Jordan.

"For us Palestinians, an olive  tree  is  exactly  like  a  son,"
Khufash said. " It is not a matter of money. You do not sell your
son for money."

Distraught at their loss --- the villagers said more  than  1,000
olive trees had been cut down in recent months ---  the  settlers
invited reporters, over coffee and orange  sodas,  to  hear  them
spin theories about the olive tree massacre and vent their  wrath
against the Israeli settlers  who  live  in  neat,  barracks-like
apartments on hilltops throughout the region. Three  settlements,
Ariel, Revava and Burkan, are near Hares, and settlers must  pass
beneath the village on their way to and from work.

"The olive trees gave us food. Now they  are  only  fit  for  the
fire," said Nawaf Suf. "We believe they want to deprive us of our
livelihood, drive us off the land and make common laborers of us,
so we have to go to the cities and work for Israelis."

When old  Jaber  escorted  reporters  to  his  ruined  grove,  he
collapsed in a pile of lopped branches and moaned.  At  precisely
this moment, Yona Shay, a 31- year-old Jewish settler  who  sells
plumbing fixtures for a living, pulled over beside the  road  and
began arguing with the Palestinians. The odds --- eight of  them,
just one of him --- didn't seem to faze him.

"There are a minimum of 100 stones being thrown  every  day  from
beside this highway. By now 200 cars have been hit with  stones,"
Shay said. "Men, women and children have been  injured  by  these
stones. . . . I didn't cut down any trees  myself,  but  I  would
have if I could have."

The old man clambered across the ditch and went chin-to-chin with
Shay.

"It is as if you cut my throat!" he shouted.

"If someone gives you a punch, do you turn the other cheek?" Shay
answered calmly. "If we get hurt, we have damage, we have  to  do
something back."

In the  nearby  settlement  of  Revava,  a  38-year-old  computer
repairman named Yitzhak Hillel defended the army's destruction of
the olive trees.

"We spoke to the army many times about  the  stone-throwing,  and
they did nothing. My feeling is, every time I come back home from
work, I feel like a duck in a shooting gallery."

An hour before sunset, the rock-throwing resumed. The minarets of
Palestinian villages glimmered white at the summits of the  brown
hills, which rolled into a wide wasteland of rocks,  tufted  here
and there with olive groves.

Two squads of  Israeli  soldiers  took  up  positions  along  the
highway and began firing sporadically  as  rocks  landed  on  the
road. Just past the stretch of lopped trees, a large white  stone
caromed defiantly off the asphalt a few yards  in  front  of  the
reporters' car.

(c) The Atlanta Journal and Constitution
Back to Top
------------------------------------------ ends -----------
Back to course