Press Release 

August 1 , 2001

Press Release Index

Al-Haq Condemns Israel’s Continued Policy of Assassination,
And Calls Upon the Security Council to Hold a Special Session


Yesterday afternoon at approximately 2:00 pm Israeli attack helicopters fired two rockets into an apartment building in downtown Nablus killing eight Palestinians. The targets of the attack were members of Hamas who worked in the building. However, four individuals unconnected to political actions, including two children, were killed in the attack. The building that was attacked is a residential apartment building that also contains several offices. The targeted individuals were located on the third floor of the building in the offices of the Palestinian Media Studies Center. Those killed were:

1. Jamal Mansoor, Hamas political leader and director of the Palestinian Studies Center from Balata Refugee Camp
2. Jamal Salim Hamas political leader from al-Ain Refugee Camp
3. Omar Mansoor Bodyguard to Jamal from Balata Refugee Camp
4. Faheem Dawabsha Office director for Jamal from Durma
5. Mohammad Bishawe Journalist with the al-Najah Journalist Office and al-Hayat al-Jadide Newspaper
6. Othman Qatanani Journalist with the Nablus Journalist Office
7. Ashraf Abdl Mina’am Khalil Eleven years old
8. Bilal Abdl Mina’am Khalil Six years old

An additional twenty-two people were injured, including three individuals who are in critical condition. One of the injured was Ahmed Abu Shalal who works as a researcher for the Solidarity International for Human Rights in Nablus. Bishawe, Qatanani, and Abu Shalal were all visiting the offices of the Palestinian Media Studies Center for work purposes at the time of the attack. Ashraf and Bilal were passing by the building at the time of the attack and were killed by the force of the blast. Witnesses told an al-Haq fieldworker that the missiles that struck the building were fired by two Apache helicopters that were seen at the time of the attack hovering over the southern area of Nablus. The Israeli military has taken responsibility for the attack stating that its purpose was to end “terrorist attacks” against Israeli targets, and saying that, “the IDF will continue in its precise strikes against militants”. Regret was expressed for the deaths of the two children. 

Since the outbreak of the Intifada last September Israel has repeatedly defended its policy of assassination by stating that it is a “targeted” policy that can be justified by the lives it saves through deterring “terrorist” attacks against Israel. During the last two months the Israeli government has begun to expand its policy of assassination. The Israeli cabinet recently reaffirmed the policy by approving the use of “all means necessary” to combat “terrorism” and by giving the military a green light to act preemptively against anyone suspected of being involved in planning or carrying out “terrorist” attacks. On July 3rd, the Israeli “kitchen cabinet” decided to expand the list of Palestinian activists who could be assassinated from only “ticking bombs” to include any “known terrorist”. Jamal Mansoor was included on this list. 

On July 22 at a meeting of the Likud Central Committee Prime Minister Ariel Sharon gave a speech in which he never once mention Israel’s alleged “policy of restraint”, but instead cited his governments continued policy of assassination as proof of his ability to deal with the Intifada. 
The Jerusalem Post quoted Sharon as having stated that “The gang of terrorists in Bethlehem who thought they could threaten the people of Israel they are no longer around.” Sharon then went on to list assassinations carried out by Israel forces in the occupied territories. Sharon failed to mention that three of the five men killed on July 17th in the assassination in Bethlehem
were uninvolved in political activities and that their deaths were merely “acceptable collateral damage”. One of these three men was a well-known peace activist who throughout the Intifada remained committed to joint Israeli-Palestinian dialog. Contrary to Israeli claims that assassinations are pinpoint attacks upon specific individuals Israeli’s actions have been indiscriminate. During the first assassination carried out by Israel against Hussein I’bayat on November 9th, 2000 in Beit Sahour two bystanders were killed. On another occasion two Palestinians in a taxi behind the car of Jamal Abdul Razeq who was targeted for assassination were killed on November 22 when the taxi they were in also came under fire from Israel forces. Assassinations in downtown areas and against civilian homes have been carried out using bombs and missiles, and have resulted in injuries and death to numerous bystanders. 
Yesterday’s killing of eight Palestinians, including four who were completely uninvolved in political actions must shatter any remaining illusion that Israel’s policy of assassination is targeted, as is claimed by the Israeli government in justifying its actions.

Israel’s second claim that assassinations prevent attacks upon Israel should also be seriously questioned. Going back to the assassination of Yihye Ayash in 1995, which was followed by a series of deadly suicide bombings in Israel and following up cases of assassination through the current Intifada if becomes clear that assassinations often precipitate rather than deter attacks. 
The assassination in Bethlehem was followed by the first use of mortar shells in the West Bank and brought about intensive clashes throughout the Occupied Territories. Hamas and other groups have already vowed revenge for yesterday’s attack and have stated that retaliatory attacks will be carried out within Israel.

Stepping away from Israel’s justifications for its actions it must also be pointed out that Israel’s assassinations are willful killings as described in the Fourth Geneva Convention, which is both a grave breaches of the Convention and in principle a war crime. States signatories to the Convention are under a legal obligation to seek out and try those responsible for grave breaches. Those individuals who are involved in the planning, instigation, ordering, or directly committing grave breaches can be held individually responsible for their actions. 

Foreign Ministries around the world issued statements today condemning yesterday’s attack. 
However, repeated condemnations of Israel’s actions over the last months have changed nothing. Al-Haq thus calls upon the international community to take the following concrete actions.

1. Al-Haq requests that the UN Security Council hold a special emergency session to discuss the situation in the Occupied Territories and to take steps to enforce the many United Nations resolutions that relate to the situation in the Occupied Territories. Immediate action should also be taken to sanction Israel for its continued policy of assassination and grave violations of Palestinians human rights.
2. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights should ensure that all resolutions relating to the Occupied Territories passed during the last several meeting of the Human Rights Commission are implemented. 
3. The various UN Special Rapportuers requested to visit the Occupied Territories by the Human Rights Commission, especially the Special Rapportuer on Extra-Judicial Executions should immediately undertake visits to the area. 
4. States Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention must act immediately under their obligations as outlined in Articles 1, 146, and 147 of the convention to provide the Palestinian people with protection from grave breaches of their rights, which qualify as war crimes, and must demand an end to abuses committed by Israeli forces. 
5. The United Nations should send a human rights protection force to the Occupied Territories to end the ongoing and systematic violations of Palestinian’s human rights. 

-END-